All the above advice is really bang-on.
Additional threads you should read:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...od-news-18569/
What the other parent is engaged in is called "jurisdiction shopping".
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...shoping-12010/
More case law on parental moves:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...sidence-14033/
What everyone is warning you about is establishing a "status quo" that you can't back out of:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...azaratz-17605/
If the other parent is < 45 minutes away then the best schedule for a two year old is 2-2-3-3:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...plained-13702/
More on "status quo":
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...tus-quo-15936/
The other topic to research is "mobility". You are going to face a challenge with mobility of the child if you give up and let the other parent move.
Good Luck!
Tayken
Additional threads you should read:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...od-news-18569/
What the other parent is engaged in is called "jurisdiction shopping".
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...shoping-12010/
More case law on parental moves:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...sidence-14033/
What everyone is warning you about is establishing a "status quo" that you can't back out of:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...azaratz-17605/
If the other parent is < 45 minutes away then the best schedule for a two year old is 2-2-3-3:
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...plained-13702/
More on "status quo":
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...tus-quo-15936/
The other topic to research is "mobility". You are going to face a challenge with mobility of the child if you give up and let the other parent move.
Good Luck!
Tayken
Comment