My ex and I will likely be going to Arbitration over the interpretation of an item in an existing order. I understand that's potentially a good use for arbitrators.
My ex is also going to challenge the core portions of the order - custody and access - as I currently have sole. Obviously I am content with that part of the order as it stands.
Am I correct in understanding that an order is deemed correct, and if I don't want it brought up in arbitration, I don't have to? I suspect the arbitrator is being used as a tool for "I don't agree with the order so I'm going to fight it".
Are there guidelines on what an arbitrator can weigh in on?
Thanks in advance.
WW
Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
My ex is also going to challenge the core portions of the order - custody and access - as I currently have sole. Obviously I am content with that part of the order as it stands.
Am I correct in understanding that an order is deemed correct, and if I don't want it brought up in arbitration, I don't have to? I suspect the arbitrator is being used as a tool for "I don't agree with the order so I'm going to fight it".
Are there guidelines on what an arbitrator can weigh in on?
Thanks in advance.
WW
Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
Comment