From what I understand a case conference is rather informal and the Judge doesn't have to read/review all of the information from the parties.
They make their recommendations (which aren't binding) and basically nothing gets settled, unless it is agreed upon???
So if things aren't settled at that level, am I correct in thinking that one then brings forth a Motion???
1) For the "Motion" do you ask for an order for all outstanding issues????
2) Does the Judge have to read everything that has been submitted????
3) Can the Motions Judge make final orders at this point? Or can they only make final orders on the issues that the parties have agreed upon????
4) What types of issues can a Motins Judge decide upon? Are they restricted to only administrative/ procedural issues... or can they decide upon custody, access, child support etc.????
Any information would be appreciated
They make their recommendations (which aren't binding) and basically nothing gets settled, unless it is agreed upon???
So if things aren't settled at that level, am I correct in thinking that one then brings forth a Motion???
1) For the "Motion" do you ask for an order for all outstanding issues????
2) Does the Judge have to read everything that has been submitted????
3) Can the Motions Judge make final orders at this point? Or can they only make final orders on the issues that the parties have agreed upon????
4) What types of issues can a Motins Judge decide upon? Are they restricted to only administrative/ procedural issues... or can they decide upon custody, access, child support etc.????
Any information would be appreciated
Comment