Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Financial Issues

Financial Issues This forum is for discussing any of the financial issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-12-2019, 01:15 PM
Olive Me Olive Me is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 1
Olive Me is on a distinguished road
Post Alimony Entitlement

Just wondering about what people's thoughts would be about alimony entitlement in this situation:

-A & B get married, A makes avg 110k and B makes avg 60k.
-During 6 year marriage, 2 kids are born.
-During 6 year marriage, A recklessly depletes due to gambling, lets say 30k per year, and racks up significant debt as well in secret.

At the end of the marriage when all comes to light, A agrees to take responsibility to all debt racked-up, resulting in unequal division of assets upon equilization. A will pay full table child support, and pro-rata share of section 7 expenses and get help with issues etc.

B has a masters degree, works full time. No previous time-off or "sacrifices" for the marriage other than 2 mat-leaves.

Does anyone think, by any stretch of the imagination, that A could argue that no alimony is warranted (or perhaps low-end of the range), because as so much money was lost due to mental illness and not spent on the marriage, there is no "high upper class lifestyle" to maintain? Zero trips were taken, no extravagant purchases, nothing. B is living the exact same lifestyle, same house, same everything, while getting the support payments, as it was it was during the marriage.

By ANY stretch of the imagination?? lol
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2019, 01:40 PM
HammerDad HammerDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,932
HammerDad will become famous soon enough
Default

Entitlement is determined in two ways, either compensatory (one spouse sacrificed their career for the benefit of the family) or non-compensatory (there is a significant difference in incomes).


Given the difference in incomes, there could be argument for non-compensatory support. A rule of thumb is if the lower earning spouses income is above 40% of the grosse family income an argument for non-compensatory support is weak. Given the numbers provided, the lower income earner here is about 35%.


As for compensatory, there could be argument there as the family was negatively impacted by Spouse A's actions.


All the above said, there are no guarantees SS would be granted. There are a lot of other factors involved. But yeah, it is possible it may be granted.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Que Alimony case to go before top court hrobins Political Issues 1 03-25-2011 01:15 AM
Alimony on EI nmhanlon Financial Issues 10 12-04-2010 10:01 AM
Alimony questions.... nmhanlon Financial Issues 3 08-04-2010 08:03 PM
Spousal Support Entitlement Stressed by Ex Introductions 15 04-14-2010 09:12 PM
Question re: my common-law hubby (his separation, divorce, CS, alimony) BGlovesCG Divorce & Family Law 4 03-19-2009 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.