Hello everyone,
I have read many posts regarding the OCL and want to thank this community for all the information shared.
Has anyone had experience with how the lawyer assigned to the child (11) comes to the “position they take on behalf of the child”? They state they are not there to make recommendations but rather to assertsin the child’s views and put the child’s views into context.
Has anyone had experience where the view of the child was presented but the lawyer took a different position on behalf of the child due to “context”. If so what context was significant enough to deviate from the child’s view.
I have read many posts regarding the OCL and want to thank this community for all the information shared.
Has anyone had experience with how the lawyer assigned to the child (11) comes to the “position they take on behalf of the child”? They state they are not there to make recommendations but rather to assertsin the child’s views and put the child’s views into context.
Has anyone had experience where the view of the child was presented but the lawyer took a different position on behalf of the child due to “context”. If so what context was significant enough to deviate from the child’s view.
Comment