I am curious.
Would there be any consequences in this situation (entirely speculative).
SpouseA makes a claim to SpouseB, indicating that based on legal counsel SpouseB must pay $X.
SpouseB believes that the claim is not valid, but seeks own legal counsel to confirm or disqualify this claim. It turns out the claim would be disqualified.
SpouseB then replies to SpouseA with indication of their counsel's commentary, only to find out SpouseA never actually had legal counsel to make a claim/argument.
Are there any repercussions in such a situation? Unnecessary legal fees? Harassment?
( this question is inspired by the thread "The cost of being unreasonable" )
Would there be any consequences in this situation (entirely speculative).
SpouseA makes a claim to SpouseB, indicating that based on legal counsel SpouseB must pay $X.
SpouseB believes that the claim is not valid, but seeks own legal counsel to confirm or disqualify this claim. It turns out the claim would be disqualified.
SpouseB then replies to SpouseA with indication of their counsel's commentary, only to find out SpouseA never actually had legal counsel to make a claim/argument.
Are there any repercussions in such a situation? Unnecessary legal fees? Harassment?
( this question is inspired by the thread "The cost of being unreasonable" )
Comment