So if a woman has a $50 bra, does that mean she's got very large breasts?
As for the shoe "collection" - I haven't read the article but I should. A pity I've got nothing lying around that is suddenly worth all kinds of cash :s
stands to reason......more cloth cost more........if you need a big bra and big panties its gone cost ya......me i don't have that problem. i don't wear any
shit i hope my ex doesn't try and reopen equalization and use it against me.
If he had of kept in his drawer a collection of watches worth $1mil, wouldn't that be the same.
On your financial statement you are supposed to list your assets and liabilities. Just because one wears something doesn't make it any less of an asset.
As for the $40 panties (gonna take the fun out of the idea and go strictly with logic), well if you had about 25,000 pair and could sell them for a significant sum like the shoes this woman has, then I would consider it an asset.
You should ask what some of th poker community think of Beth Shak.....she is a supposed poker pro, but most are of the belief that she isn't so much of a pro, but wealthy enough to play and not worry about the money......
If he had of kept in his drawer a collection of watches worth $1mil, wouldn't that be the same.
On your financial statement you are supposed to list your assets and liabilities. Just because one wears something doesn't make it any less of an asset.
As for the $40 panties (gonna take the fun out of the idea and go strictly with logic), well if you had about 25,000 pair and could sell them for a significant sum like the shoes this woman has, then I would consider it an asset.
You should ask what some of th poker community think of Beth Shak.....she is a supposed poker pro, but most are of the belief that she isn't so much of a pro, but wealthy enough to play and not worry about the money......
the panties are worth more if they are worn.....you see them on the internet for sale all the time.
would you be able to include the increase in value for equalization?
Comment