I'm looking for some advice for a situation that has come up. I recently posted about an ex wanting to move over 200km away.
Well the short story is that
Ex sent an email stating intent to move over 200km away. A response was sent stating that NCP did not consent to move as it would prevent a relationship with children and current separation agreement access would no longer be able to be followed (one night a week and eow).
Verbal conversations occurred with both CP and kids, NCP was convinced that kids wanted to make this move and would be happy with it and CP said they would share the driving and give extra time in the near future to make up for loss of weeknight access.
Nothing was ever officially changed as far as original separation agreement goes.
The current problem is this.
The CP is getting tired of sharing the driving. CP claims that sharing the driving did not mean 50/50 driving each weekend.
NCP has restated the following. They will pick child up on beginning of access and CP will pick up at end of access, OR NCP will meet halfway at beginning of access and halfway at end if access.
The amount of driving if NCP does the majority is over 600kms and is a financial burden that NCP did not agree to when consenting to move.
Is NCP sol or what?
What happens if CP denies visitation because NCP does not agree to this new 75/25 split of the driving?
(I should also add that CP and NCP have shares the driving 50/50 for the last 5 weeks since CP moved)
Well the short story is that
Ex sent an email stating intent to move over 200km away. A response was sent stating that NCP did not consent to move as it would prevent a relationship with children and current separation agreement access would no longer be able to be followed (one night a week and eow).
Verbal conversations occurred with both CP and kids, NCP was convinced that kids wanted to make this move and would be happy with it and CP said they would share the driving and give extra time in the near future to make up for loss of weeknight access.
Nothing was ever officially changed as far as original separation agreement goes.
The current problem is this.
The CP is getting tired of sharing the driving. CP claims that sharing the driving did not mean 50/50 driving each weekend.
NCP has restated the following. They will pick child up on beginning of access and CP will pick up at end of access, OR NCP will meet halfway at beginning of access and halfway at end if access.
The amount of driving if NCP does the majority is over 600kms and is a financial burden that NCP did not agree to when consenting to move.
Is NCP sol or what?
What happens if CP denies visitation because NCP does not agree to this new 75/25 split of the driving?
(I should also add that CP and NCP have shares the driving 50/50 for the last 5 weeks since CP moved)
Comment