Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Domestic Violence

Domestic Violence Dealing with abuse and violence. Getting support and help.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 05-24-2022, 10:16 PM
rockscan rockscan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 6,729
rockscan will become famous soon enoughrockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

At the risk of having this thread closed I think the mods need to step in and do something about the hijacking that has happened. Which is sad because cases like these should be celebrated as examples of change that is needed. Not to mention that the female survivors on this forum who could benefit from knowing these cases get punished further by having these discussions stopped because a small group didnt like being asked to stop trashing them. Which means that instead of being reprimanded for hijacking a topic unnecessarily, the thread will be closed to further IMPORTANT discussion and case sharing.

It is ironic that the people accusing the women of male bashing are, in their own posts, female bashing.

This thread is also an example of why these cases are importantsurvivors of domestic violence having their trauma acknowledged by the courts and survivors of domestic violence kindly asking that their vindication not be diluted on this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-24-2022, 10:20 PM
blinkandimgone's Avatar
blinkandimgone blinkandimgone is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lucknow
Posts: 5,551
blinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the rough
Default

Agreed.

This thread doesn't need to be hijacked with 'whataboutisms'.

If anyone would like to discuss false accusations or other topics, please make your own thread and discuss it there.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-24-2022, 11:03 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Buried in paperwork
Posts: 647
Jeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud of
Default

Thanks.

Yes, please keep the thread focused on the issue being discussed.

I have moved the off topic posts to a separate thread in the forum.

I have sticky'd this thread.
__________________
Ottawa Divorce
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-25-2022, 02:04 AM
pinkHouses pinkHouses is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 579
pinkHouses has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Ok. But what certainly is not off topic is the insinuation (directly implied by example of a man being a victim because another man did the violence) that only men commit violence and it isn't all physical.
The definition of violence in Family Law is different. So also watch what you say to avoid being caught up in it.
I also think that this was an extreme case and only time will tell if this gets applied to cases more in the norm.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-25-2022, 06:37 AM
blinkandimgone's Avatar
blinkandimgone blinkandimgone is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lucknow
Posts: 5,551
blinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the rough
Default

Not one person has said or implied only men are abusers.

Stop trying to minimize the importance of this case, and devalue the accomplishment of the self repped mother.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-25-2022, 09:50 AM
Stillbreathing Stillbreathing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 705
Stillbreathing will become famous soon enough
Default

I think allowing the mother to bring a tort claim under the umbrella of family litigation and making this monumental ruling, the judge is sending a strong message that:
1. Domestic Violence is real and does exist in all its ugliness
2. Society and the courts will no longer tolerate intimate partner abuse
3. If you are an abuser, beware because the court is willing to impose serious financial consequences against you
4. Domestic abuse is not a victimless crime and victims should be compensated

I also feel this case may help in other ways as well. My lawyer discouraged me from focusing too much attention on the domestic abuse during the marriage or litigation. They felt that given the current court atmosphere it would be best to use other arguments to advance my case.
The aforementioned case may now give lawyers ammunition to bring to light domestic violence suffered by their clients versus shying away from it!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-25-2022, 11:46 AM
blinkandimgone's Avatar
blinkandimgone blinkandimgone is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lucknow
Posts: 5,551
blinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillbreathing View Post
I think allowing the mother to bring a tort claim under the umbrella of family litigation and making this monumental ruling, the judge is sending a strong message that:
1. Domestic Violence is real and does exist in all its ugliness
2. Society and the courts will no longer tolerate intimate partner abuse
3. If you are an abuser, beware because the court is willing to impose serious financial consequences against you
4. Domestic abuse is not a victimless crime and victims should be compensated

I also feel this case may help in other ways as well. My lawyer discouraged me from focusing too much attention on the domestic abuse during the marriage or litigation. They felt that given the current court atmosphere it would be best to use other arguments to advance my case.
The aforementioned case may now give lawyers ammunition to bring to light domestic violence suffered by their clients versus shying away from it!
I think many, many people have been discouraged from adding any focus on DV in their cases for a very long time, especially when there are kids involved. Keeping the focus on the kids is important, however having recourse for DV is equally important.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-25-2022, 11:54 AM
pinkHouses pinkHouses is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 579
pinkHouses has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blinkandimgone View Post

Stop trying to minimize the importance of this case, and devalue the accomplishment of the self repped mother.
You just made that up.
Never did I devalue the accomplishments of the self-repped LITTIGANT. I don't understand why them being a mother is important here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blinkandimgone View Post
Not one person has said or implied only men are abusers.
It is like this board has its own personal definition of DV; Family Law be damned.

Here there is the acknowledgement that men can be abused if another man does it. Implication by exclusion.

Why not say be more inclusive and quicker by saying "Intimate partner violence can be committed by any one partner against the other, period":

Quote:
Originally Posted by iona6656 View Post
Intimate partner violence- which happens in every context, e.g. committed against the husband in a cisgender marriage; same sex unions, etc- all of them are important and as a society we need to start doing more to recognize this issue and the impact on family court proceedings.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-25-2022, 12:00 PM
blinkandimgone's Avatar
blinkandimgone blinkandimgone is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lucknow
Posts: 5,551
blinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the roughblinkandimgone is a jewel in the rough
Default

Neither this thread nor this case are about defining DV to suit a particular person, or male vs female abusers.

If you don't have anything of value to add to the original topic, please take those comments to a thread dedicated to those topics.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-25-2022, 12:16 PM
StillPaying StillPaying is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 617
StillPaying has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

I don't see this as amazing, and certainly not a reason to go back to record more abuse which will always come as a perceived setup. This family court IPV acknowledgment is nothing more than a money grab while you still 50/50 coparent with this person.

IMO, criminal court and protective orders are available. If you decide to forgive and stay with them, asking for money later does nothing. Family court has always dealt with abuse, so I don't see a payout making it better.

It was hard, but I could understand paying my ex ss along with the equalization payment. To turn around and take that money back for how my ex treated me throughout the marriage, although glorifying would make no sense.

Unless you're dealing with someone wealthy, I don't see this going far and wide. Does a slap from RS cost more than Blink? Physical vs emotional, rich vs poor, old vs young, male vs female, disabled vs able-bodied? Most of the items Iona mentioned would be covered under a ss claim; and I could understand the tort claim against CAS/accuser. But a spouse... I see this going really bad. I'd rather get my cost awarded.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Case Law, Case Conference and Mediation Free-spirit Divorce & Family Law 5 09-30-2012 09:55 PM
Costs in Bad Faith mom2three Financial Issues 1 10-24-2011 04:19 PM
Postponing Case Conference frustrateddad1970 Divorce & Family Law 2 06-18-2011 11:38 AM
No doc been served from Respondent for case conference nick2009 Divorce & Family Law 6 01-22-2010 08:38 PM
Citing Case Law justafool Common Law Issues 29 09-18-2009 08:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.