There are three kinds of bad lawyers:
1. Stupid lawyers.
2. Deceitful Lawyers.
3. Stupid and deceitful lawyers.
The worst lawyer to deal with is #1 in my opinion. Why? At least with #2 you can figure out their game plan and they have one. You know what they are going to do. With #1... Their bad conduct is random and unpredictable.
#3 is not as dangerous as #2 because they will do stupid things like... purely as an example... have their client commission an affidavit the day prior to their client calling the police, making false allegations and abducting the children in contravention of section 283.(1) of the CCC all while claiming that the police "assisted" in the removal of children... and that day being a Saturday when courts are closed and when statistically 99% of parental abductions happen (as identified by Child Find). They will be even stupid enough to file this affidavit not realizing how transparent the nonsense is on their emergency ex-parte motion... Judges notice that kind of stupidity and don't usually have kind words when this transparent conduct happens.
A deceitful and not stupid lawyer would have in the above example simply setup the affidavit and not commissioned the affidavit until after their client had met with them and after they followed their lawyer's instruction to attempt to entrap the the other party in false criminal charge.
But, usually, these stupid lawyers have even stupider clients who themselves leave so much evidence in their wake of stupidity that it even makes it worse for their clients...
Good Luck!
Tayken
1. Stupid lawyers.
2. Deceitful Lawyers.
3. Stupid and deceitful lawyers.
The worst lawyer to deal with is #1 in my opinion. Why? At least with #2 you can figure out their game plan and they have one. You know what they are going to do. With #1... Their bad conduct is random and unpredictable.
#3 is not as dangerous as #2 because they will do stupid things like... purely as an example... have their client commission an affidavit the day prior to their client calling the police, making false allegations and abducting the children in contravention of section 283.(1) of the CCC all while claiming that the police "assisted" in the removal of children... and that day being a Saturday when courts are closed and when statistically 99% of parental abductions happen (as identified by Child Find). They will be even stupid enough to file this affidavit not realizing how transparent the nonsense is on their emergency ex-parte motion... Judges notice that kind of stupidity and don't usually have kind words when this transparent conduct happens.
A deceitful and not stupid lawyer would have in the above example simply setup the affidavit and not commissioned the affidavit until after their client had met with them and after they followed their lawyer's instruction to attempt to entrap the the other party in false criminal charge.
But, usually, these stupid lawyers have even stupider clients who themselves leave so much evidence in their wake of stupidity that it even makes it worse for their clients...
Good Luck!
Tayken
Comment