Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Parenting Issues

Parenting Issues This forum is for discussing any of the parenting issues involved in your divorce, including parenting of step-children.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 02-19-2014, 08:36 PM
Links17 Links17 is offline
Hand of Justice
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: In the Shadows
Posts: 3,166
Links17 is on a distinguished road
Default

So custody is shared, good!

Child Support.
-20yr old is entitled to CS as long as in full-time school
-12yr old too
-univ fees are payable in prop to ur incomes

Assuming you prove loco parentis (did they call him dad, did he discipline them etc... might be interesting to approach it comparatively)

Arrears to collect

SS

-based on what you have said you have a compensatory claim to SS even if you are currently independant since you sacrificed for the family unit.
-I would suggest you try to justify how much you lost out due to ur family
-you can ask for a mnthly amount for X # of months (since you are already independant a term is reasonable)
-you can also ask for a lump sum which would NOT be taxable to you nor tax deductible to him you can get that by taking the total monthly amounts and reducing by 35%

Access
-if I were you I would ENCOURAGE your daughter to see her father so long as he game and she is comfortable. You are obligated to encourage contact. She is 12 so she will determine things in a few years anyways and he has another family he prob won't pursue.
50/50 is not the default, status quo is the default and the best interest of the kids
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-19-2014, 11:00 PM
engineer engineer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 17
engineer is on a distinguished road
Default

I am answering a few points made by a few posters.

I was widowed shortly after the oldest was born.

Both kids called him dad. The youngest only just learned that her sister is a half sister. We just never got around to telling her we had both been previously married. He disciplined both - more the older than the younger, but some of that is related to their relative ages. Teenagers tend to garner a lot more negative attention than do their younger siblings.

I do encourage both kids to talk with him. Sounds morbid, but I explained to the oldest that should something happen to me, she would be sorry that she alienated herself from him. I remind the youngest to answer his texts when he sends them.

I fear the situation that Ms Mom has - the ex just saying no because he can. His primary tool for any kind of discussion was to refuse to participate when we were together, so I can only imagine it will be worse now that we aren't.

It appears that he wants joint custody more for appearances than anything else. He has not indicated that he wants scheduled access at all.

The only reason I brought up his new wife was because he chose to be with her over his kids since he met her in 2010. I have gone through the travel dates, recovered digital images, chat logs, etc, etc. No doubt, he was an absentee father as much by choice as anything else. I get that he wanted split from me and I am well past that. The kids were collateral damage, and that is inexcusable.

I am going for SS as well. My career has suffered, and it is unlikely that I will completely recover. I made sacrifices for the benefit of his career. I would prefer a lump sum payment but we will see what we can negotiate. He is in his late fifties, so once her retires, if he even can, I will out-earn him for about 5 years simply because I am younger and will remain in the workforce.

I would like CS for both kids, including section 7 items, based on line 150 of his return. I would like arrears at least back to August 2013, because I started actively pursuing CS at that time. I hear conflicting accounts of whether you can realistically get retroactive CS, so we will see how it goes and I will take what I can get.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-19-2014, 11:43 PM
Rioe's Avatar
Rioe Rioe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,349
Rioe will become famous soon enough
Default

You are obviously a math person, and it sounds like your ex is more of a feelings person. You may find When Math People and Feelings People Negotiate - High Conflict Institute a very useful read.

Being a fact-driven engineer is all well and good, but court doesn't work that way. Both sides present a judge with what they want (facts), provide excerpts from legal precedents to support their argument (more facts), and whoever has the most eloquent lawyer usually wins (how pretty the spreadsheet is). Sometimes a certain judge just likes things set up a certain way.

Before you get to that point though, you might be able to convince your ex to negotiate with you and come to an agreement without court. You need to figure out his golden apple, and figure out a way to get close enough to it that he will accept yours.

I hope I've encapsulated well here:

  • He wants joint custody so he doesn't look bad, and you want sole custody to make you and your child's lives easier.
  • He wants reasonable and liberal access to the younger child, but not a spelled out schedule. You want to not force her to take unwanted overnights.
  • You want SS because of the damage to your career while you built up his. He probably won't want to pay it.
  • You want CS and section 7 for both children, because he was essentially a father to the older step-child as well as the younger child. He will likely want to only pay for the biological child.
  • You want him to pay you back your share of the joint money (you have closed all joint accounts by now, right?) he took from behind your back to pay off a personal debt.

There's probably a lot more you can determine about each of these categories based on how well you know him.

Look on the sliding scale of each of these items, and decide where you would be willing to budge and where you absolutely won't. Then use one area to balance another.

I'll start with the custody thing as that's where your thread has spent the most time so far.

It sounds like you want sole custody because you believe your ex would not make good decisions on behalf of the child, out of disinterest or inability to engage in discussion with you. Could you prove that in court? Is there a documented history of you having difficulty getting important things decided because he was uncooperative or antagonistic? Have you got records of opportunities being missed? How have you dealt with these situations in the past? Would you be able to keep doing it? Some people with joint custody deal with uncooperative exes by giving them a deadline, and making it clear that they will take non-response as assent. The way you describe it, joint custody is very important to him. Technically, he has joint custody right now. How has it been working out? Unless you can point to specific documented failures, he would probably win in court. So use this as his apple, since you wouldn't be giving up anything you probably wouldn't lose in court, as noted by previous posters. If he'll agree to CS for the older child and section 7 for tuition, you'll go along with joint custody, for example.

Offer to lower your request for SS from mid amount to low amount or whatever in exchange for getting back the joint money he spent. Etc. It's all about negotiation.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-20-2014, 01:15 AM
engineer engineer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 17
engineer is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks. I am indeed a math person. Probably the mathiest engineer that doesn't work in academia. My ex is also an engineer, but he is a bit foggy when it comes to data. He is not a feeling person at all, he lacks empathy. Most people describe him as cold, to be honest.

Other than that, you have pretty much got it right. I only focused this on the custody right now because the financials are easier to communicate as they are numbers based. I have good records and lots of supporting documents.

My lawyer said the same thing as you said - although we can go for sole custody and have a decent argument, it would come at a cost. We can let him have joint custody in exchange for something else, and the truth is I will be making the decisions anyway because the primary residence will be with me.

At first, he said he would of course provide CS for both kids. Then he saw the tables. He is trying to get from under supporting the oldest for the cost. I can see that, and of course he will try whatever he thinks might work. This will be tough, though. He has been her dad for many years.

I have loads of history showing antagonism and failure to cooperate. Since he was away for much of the last three years, we sent emails much more frequently than we would have normally - time difference, etc made having long conversations where decisions had to be made more difficult over the phone. Note that on occasion, I would acquiesce to his opinion to keep the peace, if whatever we were talking about wasn't life threatening anyway. Mostly, important things for the kids didn't get missed because I would take an executive decision based on the facts that were in front of me and I was the only parent there to decide. I could keep doing this, no problem. Most of life's major decisions - religion and education planning - were made long ago. Neither of us would withhold medical or dental treatment.

I would also rather have unscheduled access over constantly having to reschedule. My youngest is nearly 13, and I already coordinate her growing social schedule with everything else. I do go to some lengths to accommodate him when he is available.

You have a good idea on lowering SS to get back the money he spent and he might just go for it.

One advantage I do have is that he has no idea of the amount of data I have uncovered. When I said in my first post that he hadn't told me he had married and brought his wife to Canada I wasn't indignant - the point was that he had no idea I knew about any of it. He has just learned that the life he kept secret for so long was not so well concealed, after all. Once I knew about this other relationship and went through the accounts, I started digging. Only then did I realise that the problem wasn't finding things, it was organising the masses of data that were uncovered. It was at once staggering and oddly reassuring - at this point, I could wrap my head around where the money went.

Am I pissed off about the betrayal? Not so much. I feel more betrayed by the fact that I thought he was a lot smarter than this.

He hasn't disclosed his marriage on his Affidavit for Joint Custody and he hasn't disclosed the significant debts he had prior to cohabitation (I have the hard copies). As a result of his failure to disclose, we will be asking for all documents related to the loan made by his employer, his expense reports, and other documents related to his travels. He won't want to go to the finance and legal department to get those, so this will be an onerous task. My lawyer indicated that many people settle simply because they don't want to get the documents. The purpose of the case conference, for me, apart from getting a start on sorting the CS and SS, is to force him to wake up, face what he has spent, and return the funds to the line of credit. (That is the only remaining joint account.) I am really trying to avoid court.

Wasn't going to go into the loan in this thread. I have loads of other financial issues that may go into other threads, we'll see. Like I said, the financial arguments are a little easier to communicate - dates, transactions, assets, debts.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-20-2014, 09:59 AM
arabian's Avatar
arabian arabian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 10,695
arabian will become famous soon enough
Default

Is the joint account now closed?

So you tally everything up and present it to him with your notice of motion. In your notice of motion you list specific demands for the information you require. You make sure that there is a deadline date for him to provide the information. The sooner the better.

I see too many people making the mistake of bouncing requests for disclosure back and forth with no deadlines. I would therefore recommend that every request you make is filed in court. Don't waste time on mere letter writing back and forth.

Hit hard and hit fast. 30 days is more than enough time for him to get his documentation in order.

Meanwhile, while the clock is ticking, you can entertain offers to settle.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-20-2014, 11:53 AM
engineer engineer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 17
engineer is on a distinguished road
Default

The line of credit is still around, he maxed it out just before we split. No other accounts are joint.

I love your thinking on the "hard and fast" approach, and I absolutely plan to hit him with everything at once under a deadline. My ex tends to deal with issues singly; he can't cope if he has several things running in parallel and he doesn't do well with a ticking clock.

I hear what many posters say about lawyers wanting to drive up the costs, but mine really has been very good about identifying issues that are not worth pursuing. He recommends driving towards settlement and to focus on the issues we can absolutely demonstrate through documentation and records.

In the original post I was only looking for what kinds of things I would need for justifying sole custody in order to get it sorted quickly and at low cost. The status quo isn't going to change regardless of whether it is sole or joint because the ex isn't going to change. I wish he would take more of an active interest in the kids, and had he done so when we were together, we probably wouldn't be where we are now. It was an ongoing subject of discussion, and I tried every approach imaginable. I admit I was a little taken aback by the hostility this question garnered.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-20-2014, 12:19 PM
arabian's Avatar
arabian arabian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 10,695
arabian will become famous soon enough
Default

IN MY BIASED OPINION, once they put their boots under someone else's bed the old family is soon but a memory.

In my opinion, it usually comes down to money. Of course "best interests of the child" is paramount in the process.

Last edited by arabian; 02-20-2014 at 01:00 PM. Reason: Clarification that statement is merely my biassed opinion
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-20-2014, 12:23 PM
Beachnana Beachnana is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,358
Beachnana is on a distinguished road
Smile

I do not think its hostility. It enthusiasm from passionate parents. Also new posts often leave out information and the as the thread unfolds everyone understands and things calm down. Of course there are always forum members who love a argument!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-20-2014, 12:25 PM
FB_ FB_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,414
FB_ will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian View Post
Once they put their boots under someone else's bed the old family is soon but a memory.

In my opinion, it usually comes down to money. Of course "best interests of the child" is paramount in the process.
That's a pretty wide paint brush you're using there.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-20-2014, 12:30 PM
stripes stripes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,838
stripes is on a distinguished road
Default

I think many people react strongly to the words "sole custody", because that's often tossed around by parents who just really want to stick it to the other party. It's now clear that that's not why you were interested.

I like the idea of dropping or reducing SS in exchange for him paying back the line of credit - SS is often subjective and emotional (how do you fairly compensate someone for a marriage that went bad?) while the LOC is pretty black-and-white - the money is missing, he took it out, he needs to put it back. You would probably see the money quicker that way if you tried to realize it through an SS claim.

I also like the idea of holding out joint custody as something that you are willing to negotiate on, in exchange for some of the items on your wish list. As one of the other posters said, you know that you're probably going to end up with joint custody no matter what, so you might as well see what you can get for it. If your ex thinks that getting joint custody represents some sort of big victory, he may be willing to trade some other things for it so he can feel like he "won".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence- Based Approach WorkingDAD Divorce & Family Law 13 01-12-2013 09:15 PM
Joint Physical Custody: Smart Solution or Problematic Plan? WorkingDAD Parenting Issues 19 09-17-2012 06:38 AM
Joint custody - questions & answers (US) first timer Parenting Issues 0 03-20-2011 12:07 AM
Custody Disputed Decent Dad Political Issues 2 06-26-2006 09:05 AM
How to proceed CatvsLion Divorce & Family Law 9 04-25-2006 10:10 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.