Hello community,
I'm back on track with some great news. Two years ago I've filled a motion to change final order based on mother's alienation practices, OCL been involved (2nd time) and provided with a report last year basically endorsing my concerns regarding mother's alienation practices and recommending that my son spend 50% of his time with me in order to preserve his relationship with me, while I already lost my daughter due to mother's alienation, my daughter doesn't even want to talk to me. OCL clinician was cross-examined in a long motion last year and provided viva voce evidence about her report.
So, here we are, after almost 6 months we received judge's decision, fully endorsing OCL report and granting my motion to change final order. He's of view that a material change in circumstances occurred and the status quo must change. His interim order increased my access significantly 3 times every week on top of existing alternate weekends, and ordered that we shall proceed to trial.
Now, here is the problem, while he knew that both children refuse to attend access (my daughter since 1.5 years and my son over 6 months now) he did not provide with a mechanism to ensure that access happens, either way, having the interim order police enforceable or to warn mother that if she continue not to comply with children's access and if she continue to leave the decision up to the children to decide (as already identified by OCL) then I shall bring an urgent motion without notice to enforce the order.
Shall I request an urgent meeting with the judge in chambers to address this issue? Any thoughts or recommendations?
I'm back on track with some great news. Two years ago I've filled a motion to change final order based on mother's alienation practices, OCL been involved (2nd time) and provided with a report last year basically endorsing my concerns regarding mother's alienation practices and recommending that my son spend 50% of his time with me in order to preserve his relationship with me, while I already lost my daughter due to mother's alienation, my daughter doesn't even want to talk to me. OCL clinician was cross-examined in a long motion last year and provided viva voce evidence about her report.
So, here we are, after almost 6 months we received judge's decision, fully endorsing OCL report and granting my motion to change final order. He's of view that a material change in circumstances occurred and the status quo must change. His interim order increased my access significantly 3 times every week on top of existing alternate weekends, and ordered that we shall proceed to trial.
Now, here is the problem, while he knew that both children refuse to attend access (my daughter since 1.5 years and my son over 6 months now) he did not provide with a mechanism to ensure that access happens, either way, having the interim order police enforceable or to warn mother that if she continue not to comply with children's access and if she continue to leave the decision up to the children to decide (as already identified by OCL) then I shall bring an urgent motion without notice to enforce the order.
Shall I request an urgent meeting with the judge in chambers to address this issue? Any thoughts or recommendations?
Comment