User CP
New posts
Advertising
|
Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which read receipt service are you using? And is it with Gmail or hotmail? Weird that they don't know you are using it...
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know what I would need is a very clear and concisely worded order that explicitly states the responsibilities of both myself and the ex.
A means to document the transmission of communication is something I'd value. Yes, I do a good job personally but I cannot control the ex. I want to know if he has opened a message and if so when because he does not acknowledge anything. It would also help organize/keep track of any disclosure of tax papers, receipts, access schedules, etc. I know ex will resist. He will claim it is not possible because he does not have internet (all my correspondence has been email for years & I know he regularly uses Facebook). He will also claim that he cannot afford it (despite him making more money than me... He just chooses to spend his money in ways that I don't). Forced to subscribe is a must for him. Compliance and enforceability of this compliance will be my hurdle. This is what has me procrastinating the effort to have this ordered... Will it be worth my hassle and expense to "force" him to subscribe? I am just so frustrated with ex getting away with this panting dead possum act. I have walked away from virtually everything because it is just not worth the fight... |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Your ex has obviously found that his "panting dead possum act" works.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ReadNotify.com is such a service.
|
#15
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
![]() Quote:
L.L. v. M.C., 2012 ONSC 3311 (CanLII) Date: 2012-07-19 Docket: FS-08-00340601-0000 URL: CanLII - 2012 ONSC 3311 (CanLII) Citation: L.L. v. M.C., 2012 ONSC 3311 (CanLII) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I recently saw a justice in Brampton do just that. The parent stated they didn't have internet access. The judge asked if they could hold up their cell phone. Parent did... Judge asked what kind of phone it was... Parent told the model (iPhone 4G) and the justice asked if the parent had a data plan. They said yes. The judge then spent 2 minutes warning the person that lies will not be tolerated in the court room. The judge then made an order that they are to communicate via email and that if the parent who claimed they didn't have internet at home didn't respond to a message in 24 hours that the other parent could make the decision in absence of the other parent's response. Great way to get someone to have to respond and read their emails. Sad that people still try the I don't have internet at home. The judge stated that it is almost as good as trying to argue you don't have electricity at home... ![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Or, you can send letters via registered mail and state you are not responsible for items sent (read "lost") in the general post and kindly ask that all replies be done via registered mail. Also, when you send a letter you should always: 1. Frame the problem. 2. Offer a solution. 3. Solicit the other parents feedback. 4. State a clear deadline (by Month, Day, Year at a specific time) that they have to respond by and if they don't you will assume they are in agreement and proceed with the recommended solution. Good Luck! Tayken |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use ReadNotify.com, and no, the recipient does not know that you are using it. It's completely legal. ReadNotify can tell you when an email was delivered, when/if it was opened and when/if it was deleted. It works with gmail. It's about $5/month for the basic service, and it's a bit wonky sometimes in that you have to go to the ReadNotify site to check the status of your emails, they don't always deliver a receipt. But it's a good way to prove that a) you sent a message; and b) your ex (or someone using his/her email account) opened the message.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The "use" of ReadNotify.com can still present itself to the recipient, depending on which email service/client they use to view emails, and if they bother to read the email headers and such. It's explained in the info on the site. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And in my opinion, OFW is the better all around solution, as it offers more than the "messaging/email".
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Email opens up a world of web-bugs which is how ReadNotify works and most of the "Internet Marketing" world works. It is similar to the email tracking system that the "stalker marketers" (SEO/SEM and SMM) use to track their customers. This will render ReadNotify.com useless. OFW will provide all this without having to use web-bugs and a tracker service such as ReadNotify... It will also do it for both parents so the information is open to both sides and not hidden from one of the parties. Good Luck! Tayken |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It actually isn't that hard today for an "average" user to render ReadNotify useless. Good Luck! Tayken |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
press release: Ontario's Family Responsibility office | Peggy | Parenting Issues | 8 | 10-22-2010 11:20 AM |
Ontario Justice Bruce Pugsley's recent comments in family court | logicalvelocity | Political Issues | 7 | 09-22-2010 06:10 PM |
Mother frustrated with family court | Grover | Divorce & Family Law | 14 | 11-09-2009 01:30 PM |
Infant Access and Breastfeeding | quake | Parenting Issues | 31 | 02-01-2006 06:35 PM |
Ontario law must apply in Family Arbitrations | lammie | Divorce & Family Law | 0 | 11-20-2005 10:29 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.