Can my ex's lawyer file (what is supposed to be a "Consent" Final Order without my knowledge/approval?
I fear ex's lawyer will choose to ignore me and file the so-called consent order
done on Form 25: Order (General) Final.
(I say this b/c I find the first lines generally 'fishy' since it does not directly say that it is a 'consent oder').
I maybe misinformed. At the same time, I have learned to be very cynical.
-Ex's lawyer has put a line on pg1 that reads:
"Pursuant to the Consent filed, The Court Orders that:......
(1) The Applicant will have sole....of ABC born....and XYZ born..."
Is the line "Pursuant to...." meant to indirectly say the "CONSENT ORDER"?
I am terrified of loop-holes especially since me ex's laywer is so vindictive.
Is an order that says "Consent Order" on Frm 25 any better (or worse) than an order that simply says "The Court orders that:"
The only issue debated is:
(#1) ex's lawyer refusing to put my legal name [/B]
(she says "...Ridiculous. On the top line it already says "The court received evidence and heard submissions on behalf of The Applicant, EFG, and the Respondent, JKL'.."
(#2) and the use of will/shall issue
- I am still puzzled, if what we have is a consent order, why is no one talking about signing anything anywhere?
Thank you so much for your help> This site is my rock!!!!! I wish I had instant knowledge to pay it forward....when things I better I promise I will!
Inlimbo.
I fear ex's lawyer will choose to ignore me and file the so-called consent order
done on Form 25: Order (General) Final.
(I say this b/c I find the first lines generally 'fishy' since it does not directly say that it is a 'consent oder').
I maybe misinformed. At the same time, I have learned to be very cynical.
-Ex's lawyer has put a line on pg1 that reads:
"Pursuant to the Consent filed, The Court Orders that:......
(1) The Applicant will have sole....of ABC born....and XYZ born..."
Is the line "Pursuant to...." meant to indirectly say the "CONSENT ORDER"?
I am terrified of loop-holes especially since me ex's laywer is so vindictive.
Is an order that says "Consent Order" on Frm 25 any better (or worse) than an order that simply says "The Court orders that:"
The only issue debated is:
(#1) ex's lawyer refusing to put my legal name [/B]
(she says "...Ridiculous. On the top line it already says "The court received evidence and heard submissions on behalf of The Applicant, EFG, and the Respondent, JKL'.."
(#2) and the use of will/shall issue
- I am still puzzled, if what we have is a consent order, why is no one talking about signing anything anywhere?
Thank you so much for your help> This site is my rock!!!!! I wish I had instant knowledge to pay it forward....when things I better I promise I will!
Inlimbo.
Comment