Did anyone went through cross-examining an OCL clinician before? Let's say the OCL recommendations are in your favour, what will be your questioning based on to bring up the route cause which formed their recommendations? Is there a standard procedure, something like asking the clinician of his/her professional background and experience, should I ask anything from disclosure meeting or just from his/her report only and collateral sources? Any advice would help, thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cross-examining an OCL clinician
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by OrleansLawyer View PostThe report is disclosed however it is not part of the record. If you are in favour of the OCL report you want them to give testimony about what they did, what they saw, and their findings (expert opinion evidence).
I believe the OCL will assign a lawyer to the clinician if the case goes to trial.
Comment
Comment