I'm not sure how to proceed from here.
...but you just clearly demonstrated that you know the ruling. So what exactly were you looking for? You then cited a different case and said...
And then quoted the case
And you then listed the three factors. Offset is just the first factor. So you have just bolstered my point that offset is not mandatory.
What have I missed?
Originally posted by Candaguy a bit back in the thread
Originally posted by Canadaguy who then said
...but you just clearly demonstrated that you know the ruling. So what exactly were you looking for? You then cited a different case and said...
Originally posted by Canadaguy trying to prove something
Originally posted by The case that was supposed to prove something
What have I missed?
Comment