Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-09-2021, 03:40 PM
greentrees greentrees is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3
greentrees is on a distinguished road
Default amendment to separation agreement

Question for you all :

Separation agreement was signed 8 years ago and a new amendment signed and court ordered 1.5 years ago changed a few things. The amendment stated that all other parts of the original agreement remain and are agreed to.

One party has threated to open up the separation agreement signed now 8 years ago and seek financial arears 8 years back. Both parties waived financial disclosure signing forms from their lawyers since the finances were so simple- basis that reason.

Then the amendment was signed 1.5 years ago again agreeing to all remaining terms of the agreement. My friends thought this means there is agreement on all items, including support and that was part of the negotiation of the terms of the amendment.

Can the other party go back 8 years? Even 3 years as I've read is often the case?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2021, 04:19 PM
rockscan rockscan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,938
rockscan will become famous soon enoughrockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

Financial arrears for what?

Were they both fully transparent on income for support? Did they both fully disclose assets? Did they both get legal advice?

If yes to all then they will not get far with that argument.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2021, 04:46 PM
greentrees greentrees is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3
greentrees is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes to all of those questions.

Incomes have increased disproportionally and financial discourse was done again for several years leading into the amendment. My friend said he thought in agreeing to those items he was also agreeing to no financial changes ---part of bargaining for other non- financial matters. And therefore included the language in the statement that all other terms are agreed to.

Could the other person request to go back and seek money from prior to the amendment? Lets say 3-4 years back and seek the amounts from one of those calculators?

I realize this doesn't make sense but wondering how someone could file to open up the separation agreement... or how they could seek money prior to the amendment?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2021, 06:07 PM
rockscan rockscan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,938
rockscan will become famous soon enoughrockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

Is it spousal support? I dont think they can do that. Its not the payors fault someone cant get their shit together.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2021, 07:15 PM
Alpinist Alpinist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Colorado
Posts: 56
Alpinist is on a distinguished road
Default

When you amend the agreement its only the items removed or changed that are 'updated' and anything not changed from the original agreement would then still be in effect as far as I know. (correct me if wrong.. I am also amending my agreement). As far as the going back only 3 years question I am interested in knowing the answer as my partners ex is trying to go back farther as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2021, 10:02 AM
arbortrail22 arbortrail22 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 42
arbortrail22 is on a distinguished road
Default

From what I understand - 3 years is normal in Ontario? Outside of that has other circumstances like proven fraud or refusing to disclose could make it longer?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-18-2021, 07:20 PM
Janus's Avatar
Janus Janus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,648
Janus will become famous soon enoughJanus will become famous soon enough
Default

Notice rockscan keeps asking if it is child support or spousal support.

A general rule of thumb is that if you screw up spousal support due to your own negligence, the courts are unlikely to save you. Especially if you had a lawyer during the time you screwed up, and where the paying spouse fully disclosed all financial details.

Child support though is the right of the child, and the child cannot be held responsible for parent screw ups. Correct child support is always owed to the child, even if the receiving parent was not on the ball.

That said, the courts also recognize that some amount of certainty is required. The paying parent has the right to arrange their financial affairs assuming that the CS amount is correct.

How does this all play out in practice?

A) If the paying parent was BAD (eg. did not disclose income increases despite requests from recipient parent) then the courts are willing to go very very far back to rectify the injustice.

B) If the paying parent was GOOD (disclosed income increases) but the recipient parent was BAD (didn't actually bother asking for an increase in CS) then the courts generally will go back to the time that the recipient parent first asked for the CS increase. They might go back even further than that, but to a maximum of about three years.

C) Paying parent can also be SORTA BAD (income went up but did not disclose) and recipient parent can be also SORTA BAD (did not ask for income disclosure). That is the one that is most commonly capped at 3 years.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2021, 11:49 AM
greentrees greentrees is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3
greentrees is on a distinguished road
Default

Its for both spousal and child support. The motion just filed tries to unlock the separation agreement from 2014 due to both parties waving full disclosure forms as the assets/bank accounts were very simple and everyone new the financial situation a few months from separating. They both signed forms agreeing to it and their counsel did as well. Nothing for 7 plus years and now the other party is stating non-disclosure with no specific evidence other than waiving 7 years ago. Full disclosure was provided leading into an amendment in 2019 with no mention of this at all. Now this filing is trying to 'unlock' both agreements since my friend wants to end spousal. At the end of the day - there we no hidden assets or accounts (not a wealthy couple). This is a crap argument right?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2021, 11:44 PM
Janus's Avatar
Janus Janus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,648
Janus will become famous soon enoughJanus will become famous soon enough
Default

Agreements are not unlocked, they are either valid or they are not. Assuming there was full disclosure in 2019, that sounds like a valid agreement.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amend separation agreement question Alpinist Divorce & Family Law 39 01-22-2021 08:32 PM
Separation Agreement Mouse_117 Divorce & Family Law 6 09-18-2010 03:37 PM
Separation Agreement - valid or invalid JoeInOntario Divorce & Family Law 9 01-20-2010 10:24 PM
Validity of a Separation Agreement NewGirlfriend Divorce & Family Law 9 12-11-2008 07:30 AM
When is a SEPARATION AGREEMENT an Agreement dvr Divorce & Family Law 1 06-15-2006 06:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.