Originally posted by HammerDad
View Post
Sorry, are you saying that the sections of the agreement calling for almost full table amount based on what's laid out as a minimum of %43 percent will likely not stand and that he's reaping the benefits now of signing it in the first place?
They make only a 10k difference now in salary and she only has 1 more weeknight than him a week.
Or are you saying my partner is basically in trouble by agreeing to it or the opposite.
It sounds like the judge erred on the side of both incomes needed to be brought into the equation based on the minimal difference between each and the access already going on. That the off set approach was most likely to be used in determining the amount but it sounds like that could change judge by judge and we'll have a different one at the settlement conference.
Comment