Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What are my options
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by blinkandimgone View PostNot sure if you didn't see the post or are choosing not to answer the question...?
Op please clarify for us.
Comment
-
Just an observation:
Divorcing Mama and Confused have A LOT in common here.
1. Both have young boy
2. When one is signed out, the other is signed in
3. Both write EXACTLY the same grammatically (English not first language)
4. Both say ex sees baby minimally by his own choice
5. Both controlling access and supervision but no abuse yet (none reported)
6. Both have issues with ex's family
7. Both same situation with CS
8. Both were "breadwinners"
I could go on here but you all get the point. This is Divorcing Mama.
Comment
-
I understand that you judge my character without actually knowing me so your opinion of my personality has no merit or validity. Second of all my lawyer opinion on the legal process holds more credability than your uneducated analysis of the family law. You draw your conclusions based on your personal experiences rather than years of legal schooling. I ask that you look up cases in Canlii and you will find plenty of cases where no CAS or Police calls were needed to prove one of the parents was found to be unfit to care for the child. And lastly, my evidence supports my claim. Again you have not fully read my post. BENERFAITH, this one is for you, if the father does not exercise his right to visit and care for the child in question, than the burden of proof falls on him to demonstrate that access was denied. If he had years of access to the child and only requested to see the child 4 times, thats his problem not mine. Your opinion of what is truthful in my case and what is not, doesn't matter to me at all. Whats funny is that the father admit s his wrong doing and I have it on record. What a great day.
Comment
-
So if you have a great lawyer why are you here? Why do you need the help from those who just provide uneducated analysis of family law?
You also still did not answer the question about CS. What you don't understand (that many here do) is that some lawyers will tell you what you want to hear. They are there to make a buck not always help you. But I suspect we will see you back here in a few months complaining how unfair the court process is. Have a nice evening.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berner_Faith View PostSo if you have a great lawyer why are you here? Why do you need the help from those who just provide uneducated analysis of family law?
You also still did not answer the question about CS. What you don't understand (that many here do) is that some lawyers will tell you what you want to hear. They are there to make a buck not always help you. But I suspect we will see you back here in a few months complaining how unfair the court process is. Have a nice evening.
Comment
-
Originally posted by confused0123 View PostIf he had years of access to the child and only requested to see the child 4 times.
Just to let you know divorcing mama...you PM'd me a while back concerned because your ex was claiming you were denying access to him. So this man has been trying to see his child IMO. He went out and got a lawyer because you wouldn't let him. IMO.
Comment
-
lol ... yep .. attack me .. call me a misogynist. That's your scape goat for everything. Stick to one profile name .. one thread.
Divorcing mama .. Im not the one who requires professional help. We can all see who needs it here. You can call all of us on this forum wrong, crazy, that we need help .. whatever you want. You'll have your day in court.
Good day Divorcing Mama.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LovingFather32 View PostJust an observation:
Divorcing Mama and Confused have A LOT in common here.
1. Both have young boy
2. Both show up at same time to double team.
3. Both write EXACTLY the same grammatically (English not first language)
4. Both say ex sees baby minimally by his own choice
5. Both controlling access and supervision but no abuse yet (none reported)
6. Both have issues with ex's family
7. Both same situation with CS
8. Both were "breadwinners"
I could go on here but you all get the point. This is Divorcing Mama.Last edited by LovingFather32; 11-11-2014, 06:30 PM.
Comment
-
How convenient .. you have both of your accounts on at the same time. Both you and divorcing mama are here. lol
Try to make sure you sound different. Because you've already given yourself away from my above-noted points.
Isn't it convenient how she decided to show up RIGHT AT THE MOMET we're discussing it.
Everybody get ready for a long winded lecture on how divorcing mama is not confused now.
I can make another account and be logged in at the same time as LF32 anytime you know. You're not fooling anyone here.
Hey how did divorcing mama know we were having this conversation right at this very second? Intriguing indeed.Last edited by LovingFather32; 11-11-2014, 06:33 PM.
Comment
-
I dont have to prove to you anything. Your the one who needs professional help because every women here you claim are exactly like your ex. Its not our fault you ex is winning her case against you, stop harassing me. Im not divorce mama. Remember the guy and girl yesterday night also told you to leave me alone. So do it. Take their
advice
Comment
Comment