Hi all.
My understanding of the term is basically - can not be used against me.
so I put it almost on all letters what I sent to other party lawyer.
This morning I sent letter with my objection to their request for adjournment ...
and lawyer replayed with
I have your correspondence of April 6, 2011 which I note you have marked "Without Prejudice".
that make me thinking what a point? Is it any catch? What is rule of thumb to use that "Without Prejudice" ?
And here is full letter.
I am thinking he just try to scare me ... Any scared here after reading that?
My understanding of the term is basically - can not be used against me.
so I put it almost on all letters what I sent to other party lawyer.
This morning I sent letter with my objection to their request for adjournment ...
and lawyer replayed with
I have your correspondence of April 6, 2011 which I note you have marked "Without Prejudice".
that make me thinking what a point? Is it any catch? What is rule of thumb to use that "Without Prejudice" ?
And here is full letter.
Since we are requesting an adjournment and I need to confirm to the court what your position is on this adjournment, I will note that you are objecting to our request to an adjournment and I will attach your correspondence to my confirmation which we are forwarding, advising the court that it will be a contested adjournment. If you intend to rely upon material which you previously filed in July of 2011 Motion, which said Motion was adjourned pending the outcome of the Office of the Children’s Lawyer report, then it will be necessary that this motion proceed by way of a Long Motion with addenda attached to the previous Facta.
In the circumstances, I believe it is inappropriate for you to be asking for substantial indemnity costs against me but please be advised that we will be seeking costs against you as a result of this unnecessary adjournment request caused by yourself. It would be a simple matter for you to have consented to this given the position which you have taken in your materials.
Please govern yourself accordingly,
I remain,
In the circumstances, I believe it is inappropriate for you to be asking for substantial indemnity costs against me but please be advised that we will be seeking costs against you as a result of this unnecessary adjournment request caused by yourself. It would be a simple matter for you to have consented to this given the position which you have taken in your materials.
Please govern yourself accordingly,
I remain,
I am thinking he just try to scare me ... Any scared here after reading that?
Comment