I'm having such a hard time understanding why when someone is 18 yrs old and going to post-secondary would a parent (s) have to pay tuition costs? If a couple is still married that child is considered and adult and is on their own. I'm not that old but if I remember correctly everyone had quite the few part time jobs, loans, grants and paid their own way - even if their parents had a lot of money.
So why are children of divorced parents treated differently than children of parents that stay together?
What are the children of this generation going to be? Yes divorce is not great but if a 16yr can quit school, have sex, drive, move out, 18yrs can vote etc....
Why is there a double standard - don't get me wrong I told my daughter that post secondary education is not an option (not that I can really do anything about it) but it's something to be earned along with marks
Thoughts?
So why are children of divorced parents treated differently than children of parents that stay together?
What are the children of this generation going to be? Yes divorce is not great but if a 16yr can quit school, have sex, drive, move out, 18yrs can vote etc....
Why is there a double standard - don't get me wrong I told my daughter that post secondary education is not an option (not that I can really do anything about it) but it's something to be earned along with marks
Thoughts?
Comment