Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It's all about perception

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by confusedmommy View Post
    well I do not have any problems with my situation , but i could help WD ,as I bought TV from his ex. I PM him already.


    all the best
    Btw - Thanks for providing your IP address when you posted this. Very easy to get traced from thee forum.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by FaithandMorals View Post
      Btw - Thanks for providing your IP address when you posted this. Very easy to get traced from thee forum.
      wonder who she will be next time?? I am leaning towards a grandmother just trying to protect her grandson from WD. She will give the excuse that all this court stuff has driven her daughter almost insane so that is why she was posting under different names. Of course the grammar etc will still be the same as Luba, storm, confusedmommy. Like the last one, what 26yr old male would use the name confusedmommy??????

      Storm try and learn from your mistakes and try to make it harder next time when you post. lol

      Comment


      • #63
        As appalled as I am by Storms antics ,I am yet more appalled by her lack of shame.What happens when her son reads all this?To be fair alot of stuff gets on Canli and add google to the mix and her kid will be able to figure all this out in a matter of years.By the time he turns 12yrs old he will have read all this evidence of his mom’s mental instability.That is hard for anyone ,never mind a child.To keep up this charade for kicks is not just insane its just wrong.What kind of a mom would do this?What the hell does she hope to achieve?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by murphyslaw View Post
          As appalled as I am by Storms antics ,I am yet more appalled by her lack of shame.What happens when her son reads all this?To be fair alot of stuff gets on Canli and add google to the mix and her kid will be able to figure all this out in a matter of years.By the time he turns 12yrs old he will have read all this evidence of his mom’s mental instability.That is hard for anyone ,never mind a child.To keep up this charade for kicks is not just insane its just wrong.What kind of a mom would do this?What the hell does she hope to achieve?
          to me she is not a mother, she is an egg donor. How could anyone do this to their own child and then have the nerve to use the name mother??? She has no shame because she cannot see beyond her revenge. All that matters to her is winning no matter the cost. In the end, when the son figures out what kind of a nutjob his mother is and the stunts she pulled he will turn his back on her unless he gets so warped by her.

          Comment


          • #65
            So childish and crazy

            The big problem is children learn what they live, if the kid don't conform to mom's crazy then the child will become the next victim, if child makes mommy dearest happy all might be okay, but if child starts to stand up for oneself and question mommy then I will bet mommy dearest will show child what crazy really is


            I hope that the judge calls for a full mental assessment, then those that need help can get it, that would be in the best interest of the child

            It takes a certain depth of mental instability to do things like this, those that are stable would never think of doing something like this, those that are less than stable have been known to snap and do unthinkable things.

            Comment


            • #66
              But she probably thinks she is doing nothing wrong in her own mind.

              To any reasonable thinking person, this makes no sense what so ever. It is not helping her legally in any way and as others have pointed out is very harmful to the child caught in the middle.

              You can not reason with someone who thinks only they know best and truly believe that they have "right" on their side. Regardless of what the evidence says and regardless of what the courts have concluded. From their perspective, all this relevant evidence falls to the wayside as they continue to prove their sense of reality (distorted as it might be) is the "right" one. Sadly, they never give up, and in the process do more harm to themselves, their child and everyone else caught up in the tragedy.

              Will further litigation change her perception of reality? Most likely not? Will she at any point choose to just "move on" having found things just have not gone her way in court? Most likely not.
              Last edited by Nadia; 09-16-2012, 08:28 AM.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Nadia View Post
                But she probably thinks she is doing nothing wrong in her own mind.

                To any reasonable thinking person, this makes no sense what so ever. It is not helping her legally in any way and as others have pointed out is very harmful to the child caught in the middle.

                You can not reason with someone who thinks only they know best and truly believe that they have "right" on their side. Regardless of what the evidence says and regardless of what the courts have concluded. From their perspective, all this relevant evidence falls to the wayside as they continue to prove their sense of reality (distorted as it might be) is the "right" one. Sadly, they never give up, and in the process do more harm to themselves, their child and everyone else caught up in the tragedy.

                Will further litigation change her perception of reality? Most likely not? Will she at any point choose to just "move on" having found things just have not gone her way in court? Most likely not.
                Who Are High Conflict People?

                High-conflict people (HCPs) have a pattern of high-conflict behavior that increases conflict rather than reducing or resolving it. This pattern usually happens over and over again in many different situations with many different people. The issue that seems in conflict at the time is not what is increasing the conflict. The “issue” is not the issue. With HCPs the high-conflict pattern of behavior is the issue, including a lot of:

                All-or-nothing thinking

                Unmanaged emotions

                Extreme behaviors

                Blaming others
                ...



                Underlying High-Conflict Personality Pattern

                1. Rigid and Uncompromising, Repeating Failed Strategies

                2. Difficulty Accepting and Healing Loss

                3. Negative Emotions Dominate their Thinking

                4. Inability to Reflect on their Own Behavior

                5. Difficulty Empathizing With Others

                6. Preoccupied with Blaming Others

                7. Avoids Any Responsibility For the Problem or the Solution

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Tayken View Post
                  With regards to my previous statements about a clinician practicing and providing evidence in an area of medicine for which they don't practice and how it will be discounted by the court here is a more concrete example in case law:

                  B.R. v. Ontario (Health Insurance Plan), 2009 CanLII 85490 (ON HSARB)
                  Date: 2009-11-05
                  Docket: 05-HIA-0266
                  URL: CanLII - 2009 CanLII 85490 (ON HSARB)
                  Citation: B.R. v. Ontario (Health Insurance Plan), 2009 CanLII 85490 (ON HSARB)

                  Quote:
                  Originally Posted by B.R. v. Ontario (Health Insurance Plan), 2009 CanLII 85490 (ON HSARB)
                  94. However the assessments by these two neurosurgeons in applying the experience and risk factor analysis led to very different conclusions on the central issue raised on this appeal.[3]

                  [3] We do not consider the report of Dr. Kronby in this analysis. While he was familiar with the Appellant’s medical circumstances and was copied on correspondence and reports prepared by the AVM Clinic, Dr. Kronby is a neurologist, not a neurosurgeon. Further, he does not provide detail to substantiate his opinion. As such, his report is not helpful in analyzing whether or not the treatments were equivalent.
                  When introducing expert witnesses in the field of medicine as witnesses they are bound by their actual registered field of practice in the area of medicine. Although they may comment on a wider range of issues and topics... It will be discounted if it is not directly related to the field of practice they are registered and practice in.

                  Good Luck!
                  Taykenn
                  I can see why she is so upset now. It looks like the same doctor (Kronby) what she said in court she will have as a witness.

                  Can you believe that ????

                  What a small word we are living ....

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by WorkingDAD View Post
                    I can see why she is so upset now. It looks like the same doctor (Kronby) what she said in court she will have as a witness.

                    Can you believe that ????

                    What a small word we are living ....
                    If that is the case in the matter:

                    Doctor Profile | Doctor Search | College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

                    Originally posted by CPSO
                    Specialty:Neurology
                    Issued On: 01 Jan 1979
                    Type: RCPSC Specialist
                    Doctor Profile | Doctor Search | College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

                    Originally posted by CPSO
                    (1) Dr. MICHAEL HENRY KRONBY may practise only in the areas of medicine in which Dr. KRONBY is educated and experienced.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by FaithandMorals View Post
                      Btw - Thanks for providing your IP address when you posted this. Very easy to get traced from thee forum.
                      LOL this thread is EPIC ... I was laughing all the way through my lunch ..
                      by all what she is doing here ... i think WD was dating my ex

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I wasnt a fan of yours at the start but no matter what you did to her, it pales in comparision to what she is doing. Maybe you need to see what steps you can take to have her examined by a mental health expert for the safety of your son. Who knows what this lunatic will do next.
                        I wasn't a big fan of WD either. Having been dragged through court myelf, I don't like the whole idea of someone boasting when they have a good outcome.

                        However, I must say...I rarely change my mind but this this case...I'm actually starting to understand and appreciate the boasting. Seriously, this chick needs to lose (insert standard comment about "no one wins in family court" here)...but seriously...she needs to LOSE because she's a detriment to her small child. She shouldn't even be a mother to the 2 fake, and 1 on-the-way kids she supposedly has.

                        The lying is one thing...its just wierd. But the game playing is just annoying. She knows everyone else knows who she is but she's such an attention-whore, she can't help herself. I think she actually is enjoying the whole debaucle. She just doesn't care who she hurts...she's too selfish.

                        WD, I truly hope for your son's sake that you end up getting him in your care....at least until his mother can get some help with her mental and emotional state. I know it may take considerable resources...a lot of time...a lot of money...but I hope in the end you are successful. Its so obvious that your child needs you.

                        Best wishes and good luck.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Pursuinghappiness View Post
                          I wasn't a big fan of WD either. Having been dragged through court myelf, I don't like the whole idea of someone boasting when they have a good outcome.
                          Ok. It not like I am looking for fans but I still did not get it - where did I boasted about outcome? I wish it never happened (court I meant)... I always said there is no winners in family court and biggest loosers are kids...

                          WD

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by WorkingDAD View Post
                            Ok. It not like I am looking for fans but I still did not get it - where did I boasted about outcome? I wish it never happened (court I meant)... I always said there is no winners in family court and biggest loosers are kids...

                            WD
                            The Honourable Mr. Justice Pazaratz: "It is all about perception."

                            As a English as a third language (Ukrainian -> Russian -> English) it is often difficult (especially messages from years past) to get the proper perspective on what you were communicating. Being frank and factual can often be perceived as "success". Especially when framing things on logic and fact.

                            Often "critical thinking" can be perceived in the wrong way.
                            Last edited by Tayken; 09-17-2012, 02:51 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by WorkingDAD View Post
                              Ok. It not like I am looking for fans but I still did not get it - where did I boasted about outcome? I wish it never happened (court I meant)... I always said there is no winners in family court and biggest loosers are kids...

                              WD

                              To bad you just saying that without acctually underdatnding...
                              to try exlude your wacko ex from kids life is complitelly different from what you saying. I read your case once and was trying to help you. Than I read one more time and regred my offer, than I read your case again and start feel sorry for your kid. YOU BOTH WACKO .... poor kiddo.

                              And just saying normal perant would not spread all this dird arround. If you won, fine bear with your life, why spreading all this mess arround? What a point? Geesssssssssss.

                              I HOPE BOTH OF YOU GET HELP before is to late.

                              To all other on forum, people get life, stop trolling, noone know his ex, noone knows real situation. Noone even knows that WD. So who we are to judje someone? As to judging , even court judges make mistakes, so what to tell about us, normal people. How we can judje without knowing whole picture. I think is unfair to begin with.


                              Wish all best to your son.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by confusedmommy View Post
                                Noone even knows that WD.
                                I've met him. Outside of being stressed (which is pretty understandable given the uphill battle he had to wage vs nutjob ex), he was a pretty quiet, nice guy.

                                Comment

                                Our Divorce Forums
                                Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
                                Working...
                                X