Question for the group...
My partner has the following in his agreement (not sure how we missed it):
"Child support will end when one of the following occurs...a child resides away from home -- where "resides" includes for school, work or vacation." (ETA: there are other clauses like 22 years, first degree, marries etc.)
AND
"Child support will change when a child goes away to school."
We're taking that as child support is payable for the summer. His lawyer agrees. His ex has continued to collect the full table amount through FRO. He cant afford a motion to change and there is a mechanism via FRO for an agreed change between two parties to save court time and costs.
My partner has a call in to his caseworker to find out if theyve investigated (he faxed that kid was not living at home two months ago) and see what his next steps are.
He also wants to send his ex a message letting her know she needs to adjust this with FRO (they have forms she can submit) and advise that this cs overpayment will be used against his portion of living expenses.
Thoughts?
My partner has the following in his agreement (not sure how we missed it):
"Child support will end when one of the following occurs...a child resides away from home -- where "resides" includes for school, work or vacation." (ETA: there are other clauses like 22 years, first degree, marries etc.)
AND
"Child support will change when a child goes away to school."
We're taking that as child support is payable for the summer. His lawyer agrees. His ex has continued to collect the full table amount through FRO. He cant afford a motion to change and there is a mechanism via FRO for an agreed change between two parties to save court time and costs.
My partner has a call in to his caseworker to find out if theyve investigated (he faxed that kid was not living at home two months ago) and see what his next steps are.
He also wants to send his ex a message letting her know she needs to adjust this with FRO (they have forms she can submit) and advise that this cs overpayment will be used against his portion of living expenses.
Thoughts?
Comment