User CP
New posts
Advertising
|
Political Issues This forum is for discussing the political aspects of divorce: reform to divorce laws, men's rights, women's rights, injustices in the divorce system, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I agree, there should be something between 0% and 40%, but there isn't, and I don't see that changing any time soon. Easier to get shared custody than change established CS doctrine. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I agree IF the real living situation is 0% and 100%... but the federal guidelines fail to recognize anything below 40% ... even 38%.. and even at 40% judges have been shown to award full support... So that is issue number one... and you said that word... those guidelines assume lots of things that are not reality.. if you have your children 30% of the time, there is a cost that you are paying to have them.. yet that is not recognized.. and THAT creates different living of standard... where they get to do all kinds of things with the Custodial parent (who get money for 365 days a year) while with the other parent they can't go to any activities and sometimes have to share a bedroom because a 2 bedroom is that they can afford.. while the CP has the 3 bedroom house with finish basement and garage... on the fact that CS is to avoid court battles etc... Quebec did it right... and the federal should think about changing it.. here is a quote from a Fraser institute review: (full report link: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/site...guidelines.pdf) As mentioned above, although Quebec participated in the FLC, the province ultimately decided not to participate in the implementation of the Federal Child Support Guidelines. Rather, Quebec developed its own child supportsystem, and the Quebec Child Support Guidelines (2011) provide, in fact, support for some key issues raised in this report. Specifically:
all that to say that guidelines are good.. but they have to admit that there are many issues that need to be addressed since they were first implemented!!! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Not in all cases... sometimes, CS makes it that they pay less than if they would have shared custody and the ex would go after spousal... so basically you end up paying pretty much the same as full CS.. and yet you have the children 50% of the time and have to pay on top of everything else... also there is the issue when the parents live further away from each other for various reasons... That is how wrong this whole thing is... |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I Agree that those who willing choose to be NCP dont deserve the right to complain about certain aspects of the Family Law System, but there is also other circumstances as to why someone is a NCP. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As stated.. not all situation can be 50/50... here is a great example where in the US (I know we are Canada but the concept is still a good one) they have implemented some accountability in cases where there seems to be abused... I think it would be a start... https://pnwfamilylaw.com/blog/enforc...nts-were-used/ And that is the problem... I have seen CP who never have their kids over their weekend... and in time, the NCP spends much more quality time with the kids... I am not talking about cases where a father makes a choice NOT to see theirs kids.. but some situation make it that sometimes it happens... and in those cases it's funny how the NCP money's will mean something to the CP.. but anything they will dismiss it... especially when you have a situation as stated that is like 35/65... that is sometimes the reality for people who work on shifts such as nurses, firefighters, police officers.. has nothing to do with NOT wanting to see theirs children.. but their schedule makes it that it's not possible to have half and half... |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Exactly my point... |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on hiring a private investigator | nogoingback | Financial Issues | 39 | 04-08-2015 07:39 PM |
Joint chequing account for shared expenses - thoughts? | billm | Financial Issues | 22 | 05-10-2013 10:55 PM |
4 way conference - need advice / thoughts | Dee1973 | Divorce & Family Law | 13 | 09-04-2012 01:29 PM |
Thoughts on using a Certified Business Valuator to calculate imcome to imput? | CycleDad | Financial Issues | 2 | 06-06-2011 06:09 PM |
Any thoughts on this? | smissttt | Divorce & Family Law | 8 | 02-21-2010 06:31 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.