LV,
Thank you for the source of case law. I have added others to combine the Fraud with lack of Full and Frank Disclosure.
My stance,
In providing a fraudulent document to satisfy the requirement of the family Law Rules, I believe it was the Section 6 (Other earners in the Household). SInce the document provided by the Other Income earner and entered into evidence by the Applicant's Attorney is fraudulent ie deceptively reduced household income information that I can now prove is false. They again are in Non-compliance of the Family Law Rules for Full and frank Disclosure. I would then Request an Order to strike the pleadings of the Applicant from trial and an Order to vary the Costs Order from trial due to lack of full and frank disclosure, fraud and dealing in bad faith.
Your opinion LV?
What maneuver can I expect in response to this Motion?
Thanks again LV,
MCbroke
Thanks again LV
Thank you for the source of case law. I have added others to combine the Fraud with lack of Full and Frank Disclosure.
My stance,
In providing a fraudulent document to satisfy the requirement of the family Law Rules, I believe it was the Section 6 (Other earners in the Household). SInce the document provided by the Other Income earner and entered into evidence by the Applicant's Attorney is fraudulent ie deceptively reduced household income information that I can now prove is false. They again are in Non-compliance of the Family Law Rules for Full and frank Disclosure. I would then Request an Order to strike the pleadings of the Applicant from trial and an Order to vary the Costs Order from trial due to lack of full and frank disclosure, fraud and dealing in bad faith.
Your opinion LV?
What maneuver can I expect in response to this Motion?
Thanks again LV,
MCbroke
Thanks again LV
Comment