I open a new topic as my last one went into a wrong direction. The Australian article is more about children, not parents, and how do children accommodate to shared parenting. (Read Case study: Read Mia's sad story)
I have a solution: children to stay at the same residence and parents to move. If you want to have 50% then you do the effort, and don’t ask the child/children to do this for your convenience.
To the argument that it is not realistic the answer is: not so long ago (20years?) a child continuously commuting from a residence to another was not realistic.
As a child I would have hate such regimen. I loved my room that was my little “residence”. There I had my piano and my guitar, my books and my projects. I would have hated commuting all the time.
I simply cannot ask a child to do what I would not do.
I have a solution: children to stay at the same residence and parents to move. If you want to have 50% then you do the effort, and don’t ask the child/children to do this for your convenience.
To the argument that it is not realistic the answer is: not so long ago (20years?) a child continuously commuting from a residence to another was not realistic.
As a child I would have hate such regimen. I loved my room that was my little “residence”. There I had my piano and my guitar, my books and my projects. I would have hated commuting all the time.
I simply cannot ask a child to do what I would not do.
Comment