Ok these are all hypothetical questions. And would love Tayken and Mess's feedback.
Background:
Two people (one male and one female) each have two of their own children and each file as single so each can claim one of their children as a equivalent to spouse.
One parent has a court order which states that they can claim a child as a equivalent to spouse, the other one does not have this court order.
Recently the female of the two got divorced from her ex, they had been separated for 5+ years, they have a good relationship and get along well.
Now both people have just had a baby #5 between the two of them?
Question 1: Can the two people continue to file a child as a child equivalent to spouse, remember one has a court order from their family court stating they can., the other does not.
Question 2: If female had remained married, but separated, that would bar any common law marriage between the two people. Right?
Question 3: A corporation is legally an artificial person. As such can a person marry a corporation they hold all the shares in, thus preventing any future common law marriage from forming?
Background:
Two people (one male and one female) each have two of their own children and each file as single so each can claim one of their children as a equivalent to spouse.
One parent has a court order which states that they can claim a child as a equivalent to spouse, the other one does not have this court order.
Recently the female of the two got divorced from her ex, they had been separated for 5+ years, they have a good relationship and get along well.
Now both people have just had a baby #5 between the two of them?
Question 1: Can the two people continue to file a child as a child equivalent to spouse, remember one has a court order from their family court stating they can., the other does not.
Question 2: If female had remained married, but separated, that would bar any common law marriage between the two people. Right?
Question 3: A corporation is legally an artificial person. As such can a person marry a corporation they hold all the shares in, thus preventing any future common law marriage from forming?
Comment