Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Trial must go on....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Trial must go on....

    From my previous threads you may know where I coming from But I will give you a brief history…My wife and I married in 1993, had a daughter in 2004, separated in 2011, my wife filed the case in family court in June 2011, she had a temporary custody from Sep. 2011 until Aug. 2012, OCL clinical investigation completed and recommended full custody to me.

    The basis of the OCL recommendation was based on few things; one the investigation from Children Aid Society clearly stated physical discipline of my daughter by the Applicant; second leaving her in the casino hotel overnight alone; leaving her alone at home many times for many hours. The applicant (wife), consented on the OCL report in Sep. 2012, temporary custody order was issued based on the OCL and her consent to have the child live with me (Respondent). Case Settlement Conference was held in Dec. 2012. I offered and the presiding judge agreed to all the points to settle the case but the Applicant first agreed and then refused when the minutes of the settlement were drafted and presented in front of the judge. The Judge referred the case for trial of 5 days with 4 weeks sittings.

    While in her care, my daughter missed 15 full days and being late for more than 33 times to school that year even though living less than 500 meters away from school. My daughter was kept in school in an after school care until 5:30 to finish her home work as the mother is not capable/qualified to help her in homework. My daughter grades were C & D and very few B.

    While in my care since August 2012 until date, my daughter has been progressing tremendously well. She has successfully completed 5 belts in Martial Arts, completed level 5 swimming, and currently in semi-finals to be selected in the Schools Swimming team and running team. Her grades have improved from C&D and few B to all As and few Bs. This is all due to my daughter in full care of my mother who is a retired teacher. The Applicant even opposes that my daughter is in my mother’s care and I see my daughter for only few hours in a day. Please note I work 80 Km away from home and commute daily and live with my parents.

    In Aug. 2011, the Applicant sold matrimonial house and kept the proceeding of more than $100k in her pocket while collecting social assistance and getting legal aid. She did not disclose and provided a copy of the Purchase and Selling agreement until Dec. 2012. The legal Aid cancelled her certificate. In Sep. 2013, she filed a notice of change of representation to represent herself in the court. I filed my notice to represent myself in the court for this family case as my lawyer asked me for a $25k retainer just to “FIGHT” for me in the trial.

    The Applicant asked to resolve this case outside the court but with her terms i.e. Child Access & Support payments. She agreed to Child Access but did not agree to Spousal Support payments which is above my median range of my current salary. Just few days ago on the court purge date, she requested to have the trial adjourned because she does not have a lawyer. The justice asked me and I said this case has been in this court for almost three years and the Applicant is dragging this for no reason and I am ready for the trial. The Judge ordered her to submit all the documents i.e. Trial Record, financial disclosures, tax returns , pay stubs, efforts to seek employment etc. by end of this week. The trial is supposed to start next week i.e. first Monday of November. I also requested the Judge that I need to add witnesses and the Judge requested to have the list submitted by end of this week.

    Now here are my questions that I need advice on:
    · Should I be worried that I may lose custody of my daughter
    · Shall I request Clinical Investigator from OCL, Children Aid Society Worker as a witness.
    · Shall I ask for equalization of property even though she is claiming it was an investment property and she was the sole owner of it.
    · If I can’t ask for equalization of property, can I ask her to provide the bases for the investment as where this investment came from because I know this is my heard earned money.

  • #2
    Originally posted by slskz786 View Post
    Now here are my questions that I need advice on:
    · Should I be worried that I may lose custody of my daughter
    · Shall I request Clinical Investigator from OCL, Children Aid Society Worker as a witness.
    · Shall I ask for equalization of property even though she is claiming it was an investment property and she was the sole owner of it.
    · If I can’t ask for equalization of property, can I ask her to provide the bases for the investment as where this investment came from because I know this is my heard earned money.
    I'm sure others who have more experience with this, will chime in.

    You already have the OCL recommendation in your favour, and have proof of how your daughter has progressed for the better, with the current custody regime, so I don't see any material change, that would change the custody. Custody is not access by the way. You could both have joint custody (decision making), but it's the current access that is likely what is benefitting your daughter more?

    Yes, there should be equalization. How is it an investment property, and not the matrimonial home? Was there another house you both lived in? If you both lived in that home, I'm pretty sure that is the matrimonial home.

    Comment


    • #3
      What is the current access schedule of your child? It sounds like you have your child primarily? Who is paying child support?

      Does she work? Why not? She should be able to work full-time, minimum wage (or be imputed an income as such, if she is not).

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by slskz786 View Post
        From my previous threads you may know where I coming from But I will give you a brief history…My wife and I married in 1993, had a daughter in 2004, separated in 2011, my wife filed the case in family court in June 2011, she had a temporary custody from Sep. 2011 until Aug. 2012, OCL clinical investigation completed and recommended full custody to me.

        The basis of the OCL recommendation was based on few things; one the investigation from Children Aid Society clearly stated physical discipline of my daughter by the Applicant; second leaving her in the casino hotel overnight alone; leaving her alone at home many times for many hours. The applicant (wife), consented on the OCL report in Sep. 2012, temporary custody order was issued based on the OCL and her consent to have the child live with me (Respondent). Case Settlement Conference was held in Dec. 2012. I offered and the presiding judge agreed to all the points to settle the case but the Applicant first agreed and then refused when the minutes of the settlement were drafted and presented in front of the judge. The Judge referred the case for trial of 5 days with 4 weeks sittings.

        While in her care, my daughter missed 15 full days and being late for more than 33 times to school that year even though living less than 500 meters away from school. My daughter was kept in school in an after school care until 5:30 to finish her home work as the mother is not capable/qualified to help her in homework. My daughter grades were C & D and very few B.

        While in my care since August 2012 until date, my daughter has been progressing tremendously well. She has successfully completed 5 belts in Martial Arts, completed level 5 swimming, and currently in semi-finals to be selected in the Schools Swimming team and running team. Her grades have improved from C&D and few B to all As and few Bs. This is all due to my daughter in full care of my mother who is a retired teacher. The Applicant even opposes that my daughter is in my mother’s care and I see my daughter for only few hours in a day. Please note I work 80 Km away from home and commute daily and live with my parents.

        In Aug. 2011, the Applicant sold matrimonial house and kept the proceeding of more than $100k in her pocket while collecting social assistance and getting legal aid. She did not disclose and provided a copy of the Purchase and Selling agreement until Dec. 2012. The legal Aid cancelled her certificate. In Sep. 2013, she filed a notice of change of representation to represent herself in the court. I filed my notice to represent myself in the court for this family case as my lawyer asked me for a $25k retainer just to “FIGHT” for me in the trial.

        The Applicant asked to resolve this case outside the court but with her terms i.e. Child Access & Support payments. She agreed to Child Access but did not agree to Spousal Support payments which is above my median range of my current salary. Just few days ago on the court purge date, she requested to have the trial adjourned because she does not have a lawyer. The justice asked me and I said this case has been in this court for almost three years and the Applicant is dragging this for no reason and I am ready for the trial. The Judge ordered her to submit all the documents i.e. Trial Record, financial disclosures, tax returns , pay stubs, efforts to seek employment etc. by end of this week. The trial is supposed to start next week i.e. first Monday of November. I also requested the Judge that I need to add witnesses and the Judge requested to have the list submitted by end of this week.

        Now here are my questions that I need advice on:
        · Should I be worried that I may lose custody of my daughter
        · Shall I request Clinical Investigator from OCL, Children Aid Society Worker as a witness.
        · Shall I ask for equalization of property even though she is claiming it was an investment property and she was the sole owner of it.
        · If I can’t ask for equalization of property, can I ask her to provide the bases for the investment as where this investment came from because I know this is my heard earned money.

        If it was the marital home half the equity is *YOURS*. Period. Now if she has squandered the money or hidden it, that unfortunately is a problem for you my friend. Difficult to get blood from a stone.



        I don't think your ex has a chance on custody with OCL and CAS on your side.
        Last edited by plainNamedDad44; 10-29-2013, 12:54 PM. Reason: cleanup

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you All. Please see answers to few of your questions:
          • She has access on every other weekend until the trial.
          • She is not working and thus not paying any child support
          • I was working overseas and the family was living with me and then we decided to purchase the house. I didn't know until I saw the papers throught the court that she purchased and sold the property as an investment.

          Comment


          • #6
            You can ask that an income be assigned to her...meaning what she would be able to make given her abilities. From that cs can be accessed.

            Comment


            • #7
              Whose name was on the mortgage?

              Comment


              • #8
                Great Thanks.
                The Mortage was 100% on my wife's name. I was the investor from overseas.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Why would you have the house put in her name only if you were financing it?
                  Has nothing to do with the tax implications of Canadian owned property while working/living overseas? So you thought you would outsmart Revenue Canada and not be deemed a factual resident and taxed at a Canadian tax rate as opposed to a non-res by having it in her name?
                  Last edited by takeontheworld; 10-29-2013, 02:57 PM. Reason: Addition

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    No my friend. You are making a serious allegation on something you don't know.

                    My credit was not good due to student loan that I had to pay and my credit cards that wife charged in Casinos to crave out her gambling addictions. While in overseas, I was working on reparing and improving my credit rating. My plan was to buy a condominium of less than $100K on our names and pay 75% as down. Carrying just a 25% motgage over a $100k property was ideal for me to get back on credit rating. But my wife and her siblings were a bit extra smart and enaged her in a brand new property 4 times the value I planned. She then leased the property and took the rental amount while I was still responsible for the property taxes and any other bills that arose. I paid 25% down on a $400k mortgage loan for her to be qualified for mortgage as I was not eligible for such a big mortage amount. Without my knoledge and with the help of her friend in a bank she prepared forged documents showing that she is working in Canada which she was not and got her a mortgage. You can figure out the rest what documents you need these days to qualify for a $400k mortgage. I was completely against this deal but I was overseas and could not do anything when she signed the purchase agreement.

                    I hope this clarifies..

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks for clarifying. Im sure the huge tax implications had nothing to do with it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I don't know why people think that MEN are always there to cheat the system.
                        Just FYI...

                        my wife sold the property which she claimed to be an investment property and I am surprised you didn't notice how she obtained the mortgage. She then collected social assistance and applied for legal aid telling them that she has no money. I paid my hard earned money to lawyers while she enjoyed milking the system and to this day is doing so...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by takeontheworld View Post
                          Why would you have the house put in her name only if you were financing it?
                          Has nothing to do with the tax implications of Canadian owned property while working/living overseas? So you thought you would outsmart Revenue Canada and not be deemed a factual resident and taxed at a Canadian tax rate as opposed to a non-res by having it in her name?
                          This is reaching, without knowing all the details.

                          Originally posted by slskz786 View Post
                          ...Without my knoledge and with the help of her friend in a bank she prepared forged documents showing that she is working in Canada which she was not and got her a mortgage. You can figure out the rest what documents you need these days to qualify for a $400k mortgage. I was completely against this deal but I was overseas and could not do anything when she signed the purchase agreement...
                          But on this side-topic:

                          I assume you know if you and your ex were deemed resident or non-resident, at the time? If not, you should clarify with a tax lawyer or accountant, or the CRA.

                          From CRA's website:
                          Non-residents of Canada

                          You could still be deemed to be a resident of Canada, for many of the reassons cited (note: Canadian driver's license, bank accounts still in Canada, even if you are not, etc).

                          You mention your ex used forged documents, to show she was working (and presumably residing) in Canada at the time. That would also be something to note. Or something that CRA would likely note.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I simply asked a question...why put a property you paid for in her name. I think its a logical question. As a former ex pat myself, as all expats im sure you were aware of the tax implications. Im not exactly sure why youre so offended.

                            In any case, its obvious you have never read any of my posts with regards for men and women in family law. Your loss!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I simply asked a question...why put a property you paid for in her name. I think its a logical question. As a former ex pat myself, as all expats im sure you were aware of the tax implications. Im not exactly sure why youre so offended.

                              In any case, its obvious you have never read any of my posts with regards for men and women in family law. Your loss!

                              Comment

                              Our Divorce Forums
                              Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
                              Working...
                              X