When I did mine it went like this
1. I filed a motion to change
2. Opposing party filed a response to my motion to change.
3. Case Conference was scheduled.
4. Settlement Conference was scheduled.
5. Matter was resolved on consent.
At this point, if the matter wasn’t resolved I believe the Judge could have ordered another settlement conference or a trial management conference would have been scheduled with trial being the next step in which the judge would make the decision.
I could be wrong so please take this for what it’s worth, but a Motion to Change isn’t like a normal motion in which a motion hearing is set. Those are more for procedural matters whereas a motion to change is substantial.
1. I filed a motion to change
2. Opposing party filed a response to my motion to change.
3. Case Conference was scheduled.
4. Settlement Conference was scheduled.
5. Matter was resolved on consent.
At this point, if the matter wasn’t resolved I believe the Judge could have ordered another settlement conference or a trial management conference would have been scheduled with trial being the next step in which the judge would make the decision.
I could be wrong so please take this for what it’s worth, but a Motion to Change isn’t like a normal motion in which a motion hearing is set. Those are more for procedural matters whereas a motion to change is substantial.
Comment