My ex's lawyer is trying to go on this angle....does anyone have any info about unjust enrichment...how to prove it....as I feel that my ex has been unjustly enriched not the other way around.
Also, what about dissopation of assests?? (Not sure of the spelling here).
What they are also trying to prove, is that we, as a common-law couple, we're functioning as a "family unit", akin to a marriage....thereby, we must have commingled our finances...therefore.....my assests are her assests and her debts are my debts.
Now, as far as the debts go...am I required to pay for such purchases as gas, lunches out with her friends, cash advances, car repairs?? Their lawyer is saying that these purchases were for the "benifit of the family", therefore, I am required to pay them. Is this correct?
Also, what about dissopation of assests?? (Not sure of the spelling here).
What they are also trying to prove, is that we, as a common-law couple, we're functioning as a "family unit", akin to a marriage....thereby, we must have commingled our finances...therefore.....my assests are her assests and her debts are my debts.
Now, as far as the debts go...am I required to pay for such purchases as gas, lunches out with her friends, cash advances, car repairs?? Their lawyer is saying that these purchases were for the "benifit of the family", therefore, I am required to pay them. Is this correct?
Comment