Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Financial Issues

Financial Issues This forum is for discussing any of the financial issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-24-2021, 02:24 PM
Kkc Kkc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 136
Kkc is on a distinguished road
Default armchair guess on scenario

Hi,

Let's get people's thoughts.

Special appointment date in November to deal with retroactive and prospective adjustment to support amounts.

Facts: married 6 years, 2 kids 60/40 split based on overnights. consent order on a totally without prejudice basis in 2019 based on a guess of my income. The lawyer actually entered the data into divorcemate wrong and categorized dividends the wrong way which artificially increased the support amount. I never noticed it.

Paid full amount until May 2020. Expert report determined my income was actually much much lower with evidence to support why it was less (I did not pull the self-employed self help and decrease my income). COVID then was going to gut again. Attempts to engage other side was futile and I couldn't bring it to court.

Had no choice but to go into arrears. The plan for finances was to do adjustment but I had to be questioned first (so I was told), her side cancelled on me twice. Eventually switched lawyers and as soon that happened they brough a motion for arrears to be paid from my share of the house. They won.

As a result of this and based on my expert verified report (they have had for 16 months and didn't bother getting their own) I am in a credit of SS by 60-118k (depends on how much is imputted to her) and CS by 12k.

On EP and other adjustments she owes 150k and only has 127k left in her half in trust of the matrimonial home.

Obviously it is a mess because she has no way to cover all these credits without a lump sum buyout.

If the tables were reversed and my income was shown to be much much higher and I underpaid by 60k, they would make me pay that retroactive amount over time so it should go both ways.

I do think prospective support will be adjusted to reflect my actual income becuase keeping the amount like this would pretty well bankrupt me. Thoughts on retroactive adjustment?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2021, 12:09 AM
pinkHouses pinkHouses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 205
pinkHouses has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

I am in a similar situation but on a much smaller scale.

I was once told that once the money is given they may reduce your future support payments. You have the home proceeds to pull from.

I don't know, I hope someone else does. I hope you can get back to the forum or me with what you learned.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2021, 06:22 AM
Kkc Kkc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 136
Kkc is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi

Yes you can credit ss and can independently.

You are correct regarding house funds but that will not suffice. I may not have been clear, her funds in the home will just offset EP and other adjustments.

It really will put her in a pickle financially. I think the best scenario is optimizing a method for a lump sum
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2021, 12:32 PM
StillPaying StillPaying is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 384
StillPaying can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkc View Post
As a result of this and based on my expert verified report (they have had for 16 months and didn't bother getting their own) I am in a credit of SS by 60-118k (depends on how much is imputted to her) and CS by 12k.
You consented to your initial income and support amount. Then stopped in May, where ex took you to court and won arrears and ongoing support. I think your hopes may be too high.

At my trial where incomes were imputed, the judge only made the changes moving forward from the date the final order was received (8 months later). No retro, cs went down, ss went up, support was about the same until ss ends.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2021, 01:39 PM
Kkc Kkc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 136
Kkc is on a distinguished road
Default

My hope is that when I consented, I had no way of knowing that my lawyer entered the numbers in wrong, no way to predict covid or my mental health would deteriorate

It was all without prejudice as well..worse case if no retro is given I can go after first lawyer for errors and omissions...she literally typed the wrong number into the calc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2021, 01:49 PM
StillPaying StillPaying is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 384
StillPaying can only hope to improve
Default

Moving forward your income can change, but it's hard to argue against your consented income which carried over through a motion as well. A mistake which cost you about 100k in a year, yet you didn't notice or try to fix? Hopefully income can be imputed and support fixed moving forward but it's definitely a battle for retro.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 50 shares custody scenario jjsticker Divorce & Family Law 35 12-05-2018 03:22 PM
guess I have to put this in general chat.... mom2three General Chat 2 01-15-2010 03:36 PM
Spousal Equivalent for CRA Cobourg Divorce & Family Law 21 01-14-2010 08:43 AM
Please, give me your best guess.... cck Divorce & Family Law 4 01-06-2009 05:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.