My husband is going to trial with his ex in mid April. This is what has happened so far:
Two years after his divorce his ex tells him that instead of the 2/3 he was to pay for expenses she only wanted 1/2, and that the support he was paying was enough, he worked hard for his money, her husband and her were doing well and that she didn't need more (emails to prove).
I come into the picture a few years later. Expenses begin to rise ($2,000 summer camps, etc). He pushes back on expenses and threats of court begin. Trips to Europe and Africa for daughter in the same year, plus summer camp for son (totaling over $10,000), PLUS braces, drivers ed, etc.
He continues to pay his share after challenging the issues.
Long story short, she files a motion to go back to 2001 to collect the extra money in expenses and back pay in support (which she never wanted).
With trial on it's way she has decided to complicate matters and file over $13,000 (his share) of expenses with the FRO. My husband has contacted the FRO to tell them that all of these expenses are currently in litigation, but their reply was that they are abiding to the SA and he has to pay. He is now being garnished his almost $1,600 in support (he ALWAYS paid support so this isn't an issue) PLUS $1,100 towards the expenses - MONTHLY.
Has anyone had a similar scenario? We are concerned about getting our overpayment back.
ALSO - the FRO has taken her 5 page list of expenses for what it is and did not match receipts to her items. There is almost $1,000 worth of expenses with no receipts. Where is their accountability?
My husband is a good man. He has paid over $120,000 (bank records to prove) to his ex in the last 7 years. He is not a deadbeat. He has never refused to support his kids. I know that we are just one of many families frustrated with the system.
I'm here just looking for others opinions.
Two years after his divorce his ex tells him that instead of the 2/3 he was to pay for expenses she only wanted 1/2, and that the support he was paying was enough, he worked hard for his money, her husband and her were doing well and that she didn't need more (emails to prove).
I come into the picture a few years later. Expenses begin to rise ($2,000 summer camps, etc). He pushes back on expenses and threats of court begin. Trips to Europe and Africa for daughter in the same year, plus summer camp for son (totaling over $10,000), PLUS braces, drivers ed, etc.
He continues to pay his share after challenging the issues.
Long story short, she files a motion to go back to 2001 to collect the extra money in expenses and back pay in support (which she never wanted).
With trial on it's way she has decided to complicate matters and file over $13,000 (his share) of expenses with the FRO. My husband has contacted the FRO to tell them that all of these expenses are currently in litigation, but their reply was that they are abiding to the SA and he has to pay. He is now being garnished his almost $1,600 in support (he ALWAYS paid support so this isn't an issue) PLUS $1,100 towards the expenses - MONTHLY.
Has anyone had a similar scenario? We are concerned about getting our overpayment back.
ALSO - the FRO has taken her 5 page list of expenses for what it is and did not match receipts to her items. There is almost $1,000 worth of expenses with no receipts. Where is their accountability?
My husband is a good man. He has paid over $120,000 (bank records to prove) to his ex in the last 7 years. He is not a deadbeat. He has never refused to support his kids. I know that we are just one of many families frustrated with the system.
I'm here just looking for others opinions.
Comment