Originally posted by billm
View Post
For me, obligations arise from the intention to create or raise a child. That is the choice that I believe is important. Sex in itself is fun. I think it is reasonable for adults to want to have sex, but to not want to raise a child. Birth control is not foolproof. Why should people be punished for having sex when they did not want a child?
If the mother has chosen to bring a child to term, then that is her choice, and her financial responsibility. If a stepparent has decided to marry an individual with kids (of whom that parent has custody), then that also creates a financial obligation. A father who is living with the mother or acts as a parent has clearly taken on the responsibility, financial and otherwise, of being a parent.
If a guy has a vasectomy and wears a condom, there is still a (small) probability of a pregnancy resulting. Given that he has clearly indicated his wish not to have a child, and taken active steps in that regard, is it your belief that he should be obligated to provide the mother with money for her to enjoy a higher standard of living?
Comment