Ottawa Divorce .com Forums

User CP

New posts


  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2005, 09:12 AM
Brian Brian is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 6
Brian is on a distinguished road
Default Divorce and Family Law needs Reform

Dear Editor RE: Deadbeat parents face stiffer penalties

The Observer Friday, June 10 2005

“Deadbeat parents face stiffer penalties, jail time hiked to six months for not paying.” I have always maintained this is a systemic problem and this legislation, which just passed 70 to two does nothing to remedy the issue at hand. We assume that all court orders are in fact fair when legislation of this type is passed and I can assure you this is not the case. Fair and equitable court rulings in a non gender-biased environment would be a quantum leap towards justice. I am of the opinion that we must heal our social issues instead of just treating them. When the breakdown of the family unit occurs we must maintain that the well being of our children be the top priority. Incidentally if as a father or a mother you were being denied access to your children and the “system” did nothing to enforce a court order would you be as willing to pay child support? The question begs to be asked; when a mother owes child support does the system pursue this individual with the same tenacity and resolve as it does the father?

Should it then matter who represents you in court? Should the courts accept information without requesting proof to formulate an interim order? Should the courts be so backed up that years can pass before the facts can be heard? Should it take 67 days for a court ruling to be transferred to the Family Responsibility Office for enforcement? Even when a payment is made electronically the Family Responsibility Office still takes days to process a payment. By withholding payments from the recipient, where does the interest gained go? I have been asking this same question since September 2004 through the Freedom of Information Act and still have not met with any success.

There is no mention of spousal support in their press release why would that be? Regardless of what your opinion is of spousal support the Family Responsibility Office uses the same tactics to enforce spousal support orders. The assumption that is being made is all rulings are always fair and equitable. Recently the Department of Justice released a proposed set of spousal support guidelines. A disclaimer on the first page of this document states, “The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Justice Canada” In spite of the fact that the Department of Justice does not endorse the views in the guidelines, the system is attempting to implement these guidelines by bypassing the proper legislative process. The Ontario Ombudsman Report for the fiscal year of 2003-2004 revealed the Family Responsibility Office accounted for 20.3% of all complaints investigated, ranking F.R.O. number one. Once again the problem would appear to be systemic. Clearly we need more then just a giant step in the right direction to make parents live up to their family responsibilities, we need accountability from the system as well.
Old 10-10-2005, 11:45 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Buried in paperwork
Posts: 599
Jeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud of

Hi Brian,

Do you have a link to the original article?
Ottawa Divorce
Old 02-21-2007, 11:36 AM
KScull KScull is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 18
KScull is on a distinguished road
Default Brian

I would also be interested in seeing the original artical, and anything related to it.

Old 02-21-2007, 12:51 PM
mom22galz mom22galz is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 63
mom22galz is on a distinguished road

Not re: the 2005 article, but the new 2007 Ontario FRO announcement that's been on the news this week.

Related links:

mom to two galz
Closed Thread

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting Article on Joint Custody Grace Political Issues 23 03-20-2012 10:35 AM
Shared Parental Responsibility: A Harm Reduction-Based Approach to Divorce Law Reform WorkingDAD Divorce & Family Law 6 04-07-2011 09:19 PM
Divorce Act vs Family Law Act dad93 Divorce & Family Law 4 11-30-2010 03:21 PM
Dad will help other Dads Decent Dad Introductions 80 05-22-2010 12:47 PM
Confused - Need Help -30 Days Up TODivorce Divorce & Family Law 1 12-22-2006 08:04 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.