View Single Post
  #3  
Old 12-09-2008, 06:11 AM
FL_Needs_To_Change's Avatar
FL_Needs_To_Change FL_Needs_To_Change is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern Ontario
Posts: 1,261
FL_Needs_To_Change has a spectacular aura aboutFL_Needs_To_Change has a spectacular aura about
Default

This is a very short union, and one that will be of benefit to the step parent. As CS from a step parent is based on the depth of that person playing the parental role. If the step parent was responsible for imposing punishment, or taking the child to various medical/dental appointments, attended school activities, and here's the topper, the child referred to the person as "dad" then the courts would view that the step parent indeed acted as a parent in every sense, and basically was "loco parentis" to the child. And this is where CS in proportion to income would be ordered. The courts determine the amount the bio parent is obligated to pay and then they also at the step parents income relative to the table amounts minus what the bio parent pays and that is the amount of CS ordered. This is if the step parent earns more then the bio parent. If the incomes are equivalent, then it may almost be a 50/50 split for CS, or if the bio earns more, there may be little to none ordered depending on the depth of the parental role. That’s the primary factor, how much of a parental role was taken, and how long the relationship lasted and if the bio is in the lives of the children. The short relationship implies that there would have been little opportunity to develop a deep bond between the step parent and the child(ren), (this is good for the step parent). Also the child(ren) had little opportunity to be accustomed to a certain standard of living relative to the new partner, this is also a good thing for the step parent.
I have a horrible flu, so words are not flowing very well, but you get the idea!