I think you have that backwards.
When dealing with a HC ex, you push trial. Each conference has a specific purpose and helps your case. If you're pushing trial, you don't delay or agree to adjourn. Quickly go through the steps to get to resolution.
When both parties are on the same page, not really a dire need to resolve and ok with delays, they'll consent to this.
Oddly, the reasonable people who go through the system properly don't have a "big" problem with it. It's always the ones who consent or came to an agreement, not having done through the entire system, who have a big problem with it.
When dealing with a HC ex, you push trial. Each conference has a specific purpose and helps your case. If you're pushing trial, you don't delay or agree to adjourn. Quickly go through the steps to get to resolution.
When both parties are on the same page, not really a dire need to resolve and ok with delays, they'll consent to this.
Oddly, the reasonable people who go through the system properly don't have a "big" problem with it. It's always the ones who consent or came to an agreement, not having done through the entire system, who have a big problem with it.
Comment