So our case conference is next week - we just got sent our copies of not only opposing brief but our reply brief that our lawyer put together. (She is the applicant applying for sole custody).
The difference between the two is night and day. Ours makes us realize why we pay a lawyer. It is organized, specific, clear, backs up arguments with evidence and looks very professional.
Theirs is vague, inaccurate, short, and they didn't even sign in the right places. Honestly I think my 11 year old could have done a better job. WTH?
I am kinda confused and unsure of what the tactic is here. I can't say as I understand of trust their lawyer but I can't figure out the move of presenting such a non effectual document.
Opinions???
The difference between the two is night and day. Ours makes us realize why we pay a lawyer. It is organized, specific, clear, backs up arguments with evidence and looks very professional.
Theirs is vague, inaccurate, short, and they didn't even sign in the right places. Honestly I think my 11 year old could have done a better job. WTH?
I am kinda confused and unsure of what the tactic is here. I can't say as I understand of trust their lawyer but I can't figure out the move of presenting such a non effectual document.
Opinions???
Comment