Originally posted by Rioe
View Post
It's not about love or deep feelings, and never has been in the eyes of the law. It's all about the money, not only the net assets but also monthly cashflow to maintain the current life style for the woman and the kids.
There are cases, where it has been about love and feelings. 2 people fall in love, the guy loves her so much, that he even treats her kids as his own. Then the relationship breaks - and each gets half the net assets, and of course the man, in 98% of cases, pays the woman, and he also gets to pay her alimony and because he also loved the kids, and gave them presents, took them on holidays, he also pays child support, so the kids to continue their lives as though he was still involved in their lives from a financial viewpoint. He never adopted the kids and the kids were not his biologically.
In my opinion, the law is unfair, because it assumes, the woman made the man successful and therefore is fully entitled to half of everything.
Comment