Originally posted by caranna
View Post
So, I always cautiously approach the content of non-professionals who "research". As Mr. Bankroft is not a clinician nor professional qualified to work with any "domestic abusers" it is concerning that he claims to have worked with 2000 people. Furthermore, his past employment history with the courts and his past employment is quite questionable.
Originally posted by caranna
View Post
Originally posted by caranna
View Post
General Information to those Reading: Caranna is trying to apply Lundy Bancroft's "theory" against me. Bankroft holds that domestic abusers hold a "grandoise idea" (egocentric) view of self. Unfortunately, the readers and followers of his litigation strategy don't realize that they are making reference to a clinical ontology rooted in the diagnosis of NPD. They also don't realize that by making a bold assertion like that they are themselves being "verbally abusive" by Mr. Bankroft's own definition. Canarra is neither qualified nor trained to even make a statement like that about a person. Canarra didn't preface her statement with "possibly" which places her in the cross hairs of it possibly being a libel statement made against me.
Good Luck!
Tayken
Comment