Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Section 7 Expenses - third party paying
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
That was all in the past. I didn't mean to come across as bitching, just stating part of the challenge. The situation is much better now that we have private lessons and the children enjoy their time at both houses without being put in the middle of uncomfortable situations. It might not be best for others, but it is the best for our situation!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berner_Faith View PostAbsolutely Billm... both parents should contribute, but to state that the kids have no Section 7 expenses because FRO advised him not to pay the ex, is not right... FRO only enforces court orders and if their court order did not specify section 7, FRO won't enforce (which I know you are aware of), but to blatantly say there are no section 7 expenses because FRO is not enforcing them, seems petty to me.
KAH- I am well aware of what it feels like to be nickle and dimed... I understand it sucks when you pay CS and one parent does not seem to spend it on the child...however, I also do not see it in the best interest of the children to miss out on activities, simply because FRO does not enforce...maybe a more appropriate action would be, figure out what the kids would want to be in, approximate costs and then see if they fall under section 7 expenses... if they do...figure out an annual total, go on a consent motion with the other parent and get a court order to enforce section 7 expenses through FRO...that way your children can enjoy extra activities... but that is only my opinion.
That has to be dealt with at the same time.
Comment
Comment