Took me a while to realise your message was here. I don't think anyone can start a contempt motion on something that hasn't already been part of an order. The rules say that a person is only in contempt if the order they are defying is unambiguous. I'm no expert, but I don't think that's the way for section 7 expenses to be brought up for the first time.
Hey Somethingelse...sorry, just figured out how this messaging works. Was just wondering if your contempt motion was already part of your more general case. Meaning..can you take out a contempt motion if the issue of the contempt has never been dealt with before. My ex is taking out a contempt motion for section 7 expenses even though this has never been part of our court case. I don't think that this is even allowable...but not sure on the specifics. Do you know?? Thx!!
