Why Canadian family law is so Feminist

[HammerDad]

OK, I will give anyone who reads this, but doesn't click the link to the chair of the OBA family law section 3 guesses who the chair is.....

I doubt anyone will need 2....

[Janus]

OK, I will give anyone who reads this, but doesn't click the link to the chair of the OBA family law section 3 guesses who the chair is.....

I doubt anyone will need 2....

I wouldn't have guessed it with 300 guesses, what is the "obvious" knowledge that I am not aware of here?

[blinkandimgone]

I wouldn't have guessed it with 300 guesses, what is the "obvious" knowledge that I am not aware of here?

Having read any of resourceful's previous posts....all on the same topic.

[blinkandimgone]

So what's your point here, resourceful? DO you have something new to add to the dozens of other threads just like this one you've started?

If not, I see no need to keep this one open. If people are interested, they can dig up your old posts.

[Tayken]

I always wonder why people come back to this site to post this information?

Is there an expectation that this community could actually do something about the problem?

Is there an expectation that people of importance read this site?

Or is this just graffiti that the poster hopes someone somewhere will read?

What "change" can this information bring? What does the poster wish to "inspire" through all this time and energy spent posting youtube links? What is the return on investment for these efforts?

[Tayken]

Really interesting case law from the solicitor in question recently:

Williams v. Williams, 2012 ONSC 5735 (CanLII)
Date: 2012-10-12
Docket: FS-10-364255
URL: CanLII - 2012 ONSC 5735 (CanLII)

This motion brought by the Respondent, asking for an order to put him on the Applicant’s extended health and dental plan so that he can seek psychological counseling.

It has the same docket number (FS-10-364255) as:

L.W. v. A.W., 2012 ONSC 3042 (CanLII)
Date: 2012-05-24
Docket: FS-10-364255
URL: CanLII - 2012 ONSC 3042 (CanLII)
Citation: L.W. v. A.W., 2012 ONSC 3042 (CanLII)

Good Luck!
Tayken

[roger]

A system made to suck up all the money and sanity of devorcing or seperating coupels. Instead of writting all of these post and blogs how can we stop this corrupted system from destroying honest loving people. I guess it starts with the intitution of mariage what a farce now days. Once your married the system (the cost of a marrige liscence $300.00 nice start for them) is just waiting for your break up, licking its chops. What's the average cost of seperation or divorce $15,000.00 both sides) signed me up. What the hell can we do to stop this insanety. Where do we start? Any suggestions?

[roger]

Finally we are weaking up and not soon enough 2045 dam why not next year. :O)

[FB_]

I think the first solution to reducing divorce conflict is a presumption of shared custody. Women divorce for frivolous reasons knowing they'll get custody and that once they get custody they'll get child support. Women fight equal visitation because they get more money by doing so. Access is the cause of a great amount of legal conflict and misery.

This is already the case.

I have not left the matrimonial home to ensure I don't lose shared custody. We both live there and we both have the same rights to the children. Until we or the courts make a decision I will continue to have shared custody and I had to do nothing for it. She can't take the kids from me and I can't take the kids from her.

[blinkandimgone]

Really interesting case law from the solicitor in question recently:

Williams v. Williams, 2012 ONSC 5735 (CanLII)
Date: 2012-10-12
Docket: FS-10-364255
URL: CanLII - 2012 ONSC 5735 (CanLII)



It has the same docket number (FS-10-364255) as:

L.W. v. A.W., 2012 ONSC 3042 (CanLII)
Date: 2012-05-24
Docket: FS-10-364255
URL: CanLII - 2012 ONSC 3042 (CanLII)
Citation: L.W. v. A.W., 2012 ONSC 3042 (CanLII)

Good Luck!
Tayken

Wow, thanks for the interesting read. That guy was an absolute shambles and couldn't have done anything more to set himself up to fail if he'd tried. Clearly he has some outstanding mental issues that needed addressing.

What an absolute ass.

[Mess]

Wow, thanks for the interesting read. That guy was an absolute shambles and couldn't have done anything more to set himself up to fail if he'd tried. Clearly he has some outstanding mental issues that needed addressing.

What an absolute ass.

Yeah, the mental issues are outstanding!!

[blinkandimgone]

I see what you did there.

[Tayken]

Yeah, the mental issues are outstanding!!

Any similarities to members of this board, this message thread, timing of this thread's appearance, the above mentioned case law posting, the timeline outlined in the case law and timing is purely coincidental.

[Tayken]

The post above by Tayken is clearly not only intended as an attack on a user, but also followed up by posts from the moderators "Mess" and "blinkanimgone" that cruelly ridicule a man's anguish.

How is posting public case law and providing a direct quote from said case law an "attack on a user"?

If abuse like Tayken's was made against a woman who had been victimized there's no doubt it wouldn't be tolerated.

How is quoting case law from a public record system freely avalible to all public citizens "abusive"?

Yet Tayken has had to be asked to refrain from that conduct in several different cases now, but continues with the implicit support of the moderators. Ridicule of men's anguish is routinely welcomed in this forum.

Asked by whom? When? Examples? How do I "ridicule of men's anguish"?

The reason they're letting fly with their abuse is not because they don't know what kind of utter pain a father might experience on being separated from his children.

Time will only tell the real story here Resourceful... I help more people than you could ever imagine. The difference being is that I help *parents* not *men* or *women* but, parents...

It's because they simply don't care. A father's anguish and depression actually may be entertaining to those posters above. I wouldn't be surprised if they even laughingly suggest he take his own life.

Actually, contrary to your statements, I have talked down two members of this forum from self harm and in one case had to work with police to locate the person. Thankfully the proper intervention was brought forward by the police and medical personnel.

It's important to recognize the cruelty of these people.

What "cruelty"?

They are the reason the system has been so broken for so long.

William Eddy, "It's All Your Fault!"

They position themselves as neutral experts in this forum but in reality they see to their self interest alone and can't be reasoned with. The rest of us have to inform ourselves on the issues so we see past them to understand not only the problem, but the solution.

Who is claiming to be an "expert" here?

Good Luck!
Tayken

[blinkandimgone]

You are mistaken: the ridicule is not of the man's anguish, but of the man's continued behaviour in creating the situation in which he now sits and whines that it's all someone else's fault, illustrated by the utterly ridiculous number of times he brought his ex to court and the obtuse way in which he (mis)managed his case. He behaved - and appears to continue to behave - in a manner that is both self destructive and destructive to that of his relationship with the kids, 4+ years post seperation/divorce.

Make no mistake, I empathize with the pain parents experience going through the divorce system when they do everything by the book and still come away unequal. However, it is inarguably clear that this particular litigant did nothing by the books, refused to comply with even the simplest request/order and purposely approached every issue with hostility and the intent to make things as difficult as possible.