Originally posted by fireweb13
View Post
Mr. Dad believes that the only way to reduce the conflict between him and Mrs. Mom would be for them to share custody of child and for child to spend equal time with both parties.
Despite Mr. Dad 's position, the level of conflict between the parties would not subside with a shared parenting plan that included joint custody. The parties have not demonstrated any ability to positively communicate with one another about child thus far, nor have the been able to successfully make joint decisions about child. The parties have already unsuccessfully been able to agree on child's baptism. Mrs. Mom claims that she wanted to get child baptized quickly following his birth. Mr. Dad was not in agreement as he did not feel that they could come up with a suitable set of Godparents so he delayed the baptism. In the end, Mrs. Mom went ahead with getting child baptized without Mr. Dad's participation or invitation. Mrs. Mom stated that she tried to resolve the issue but Mr. Dad refused to cooperate with her on this matter.
the level of conflict between the parties would not subside with a shared parenting plan that included joint custody.
this why conflict exist in first place ... I mean all recent research confirm opposite..
basically from Mom s point of view if I do not agree with her I am not cooperating ... and What I was saying about baptism that we should come up with god parents with whom child will benefit first of. People whom you would trust to care for child in case both parents will die.
Comment