Learned friends,
Most of the background info is in my original thread...
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...variance-7603/
... but I have a simple (I think) question. Quick recap:
I am the custodial parent, Mom lives in Saskatchewan.
She has demanded spousal support, including arrears, despite a verbal agreement that I wouldn't pay SS and she wouldn't pay CS.
It's with the lawyers right now and my motion is ready to go. We sent them an Offer based on our incomes and the new Custodial Payor (of SS) formula, but one thing is confusing me - my lawyer insists that the SS she recieves is not counted as income for the purpose of calculating CS table amount. His explanation, basically, is that CS Table is based on Line 150 MINUS any SS received.
Can anybody here confirm or (hopefully) refute this? I'll need a reference, as my counsel showed me one from the CS Guidelines that seems to support his position in black and white.
What I'm hoping to be able to do is have SS = CS so no money has to change hands. I don't want her money and can afford to raise the kids comfortably without it, but it will REALLY peeve (ahem) me off to have to continue to have to pay her to continue to sit on her arse in perpetuity while I am raising the kids on my own.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers!
Gary
Most of the background info is in my original thread...
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...variance-7603/
... but I have a simple (I think) question. Quick recap:
I am the custodial parent, Mom lives in Saskatchewan.
She has demanded spousal support, including arrears, despite a verbal agreement that I wouldn't pay SS and she wouldn't pay CS.
It's with the lawyers right now and my motion is ready to go. We sent them an Offer based on our incomes and the new Custodial Payor (of SS) formula, but one thing is confusing me - my lawyer insists that the SS she recieves is not counted as income for the purpose of calculating CS table amount. His explanation, basically, is that CS Table is based on Line 150 MINUS any SS received.
Can anybody here confirm or (hopefully) refute this? I'll need a reference, as my counsel showed me one from the CS Guidelines that seems to support his position in black and white.
What I'm hoping to be able to do is have SS = CS so no money has to change hands. I don't want her money and can afford to raise the kids comfortably without it, but it will REALLY peeve (ahem) me off to have to continue to have to pay her to continue to sit on her arse in perpetuity while I am raising the kids on my own.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers!
Gary
Comment