So - tomorrow is our settlement conference with a judge. I'm freaked out as my ex's brief has an equalization payment due of $36K by me (some disputed asset values). But in lieu of me making that payment - she wants me to cover her mortgage on our matrimonial home until she sells the house when my son moves out (5-7 years). This is in addition to an agreed to spousal support amount and table amount for child support.
She wants me to continue to be on the mortgage - which will hurt my own ability to get a mortgage on my own at some point in the future. (cs + ss + mortgage = more than half of my take home pay.)
I never thought I'd be asked to continue to pay the mortgage after we're divorced. Never even occurred to me. Is this something a judge may support?
Thoughts are appreciated.
She wants me to continue to be on the mortgage - which will hurt my own ability to get a mortgage on my own at some point in the future. (cs + ss + mortgage = more than half of my take home pay.)
I never thought I'd be asked to continue to pay the mortgage after we're divorced. Never even occurred to me. Is this something a judge may support?
Thoughts are appreciated.
Comment