Hope you are using spread sheets supported by documentation. You certainly do not have to respond to every point your ex has stated. You can simply state N/A - not applicable or not relevant. This is where your lawyer comes in - to point out to you what is relevant at this stage of your litigation. You are actually at a pre-litigation stage but everything you put in writing is there for the duration so you have to be very careful.
I'm sure my questions will be somewhat annoying to you. I was married for 30 years and full partner with my husband. I know many people who were divorcing who were wealthy. Most of them settled out-of-court/privately. Others went through horrendous, lengthy litigation where the only winners were the lawyers. You weren't married long. Look at a step-down spousal support arrangement. Judges like it (even in my case of a long-term marriage). Judges want to be seen as "fair" so nobody every really wins, except on costs awards when one party is totally unreasonable.
I'm sure my questions will be somewhat annoying to you. I was married for 30 years and full partner with my husband. I know many people who were divorcing who were wealthy. Most of them settled out-of-court/privately. Others went through horrendous, lengthy litigation where the only winners were the lawyers. You weren't married long. Look at a step-down spousal support arrangement. Judges like it (even in my case of a long-term marriage). Judges want to be seen as "fair" so nobody every really wins, except on costs awards when one party is totally unreasonable.
Comment