Originally posted by blinkandimgone
View Post
At no time was it suggested he not be able to attend games or that hockey would interfere with his visits. He has just chosen not to pay. The question was does he have a legal responsibilty to pay. I think a couple of the posters pointed out that at this level it is not considered Section 7. Thanks for the clarification.
However, on this note. He comes from a family of strong hockey players and will be playing for many years. Dad cannot even skate properly. So pardon me if I feel he is being vindictive. Because Dad is always about Being in control and winning against Mom.
Comment