Have been hit with this recently - just curious if anyone else has.

Argument (by ex) put forth to have 1% of CS provided to her designated towards S7. Problem is that ex is now putting that 1% (1800.00) on her side of the ledger as a cost into DivorceMate Calculations. This in turn artificially inflates CS and SS. She further wants that 1% to increase to 3-5% which will then make CS and SS to a point where I can't make monthly budget costs.

This 1% "solution" is case law coming out of NB.

My... understanding (and please correct me if wrong) is that CS gets determined first - then if there is a set S7 payment per month - say 150-200.00/mth - that gets paid second. After those numbers are put in the resulting SS calculations are done.

Is this the correct method or not?

Has anyone done this 1% or been subjected to it?

Argument (by ex) put forth to have 1% of CS provided to her designated towards S7. Problem is that ex is now putting that 1% (1800.00) on her side of the ledger as a cost into DivorceMate Calculations. This in turn artificially inflates CS and SS. She further wants that 1% to increase to 3-5% which will then make CS and SS to a point where I can't make monthly budget costs.

This 1% "solution" is case law coming out of NB.

My... understanding (and please correct me if wrong) is that CS gets determined first - then if there is a set S7 payment per month - say 150-200.00/mth - that gets paid second. After those numbers are put in the resulting SS calculations are done.

Is this the correct method or not?

Has anyone done this 1% or been subjected to it?

## Comment