first time posting on here but i have been doing a lot of reading. i had my first mediation appt today and the mediator (a lawyer) basically came out and told me in front of the ex that there is no way a judge would award a lump sum payment for ss or cs unless she agreed to it. Then she went on to say that if she quits her job and only makes 20000 a year she will only pay based on the 20000 as it changes with income.2011 she made over 100000 but only claimed 88000 we currently have a 50/50 shared i have received nothing from her in over a year there is no sa. im being drained
the ex is a dancer and all income is cash and gifts but luckily she did claim a good portion of her income .the problem is she has come out and told me she will never pay either as she will just "quit her job" and claim nothing. this is why we (my lawyer and i) were looking for a lump sum payment option. so i guess my question is what is the likely hood of lump sum payments ordered? i am a self employed contracter and she easily makes 3 times i do. i had already agreed to impute my income above what i actually make as per my lawyers advice but think that was a mistake as she is denying she makes anything more than what she claims.
the ex is a dancer and all income is cash and gifts but luckily she did claim a good portion of her income .the problem is she has come out and told me she will never pay either as she will just "quit her job" and claim nothing. this is why we (my lawyer and i) were looking for a lump sum payment option. so i guess my question is what is the likely hood of lump sum payments ordered? i am a self employed contracter and she easily makes 3 times i do. i had already agreed to impute my income above what i actually make as per my lawyers advice but think that was a mistake as she is denying she makes anything more than what she claims.
Comment