Long story short....
We both have lawyers. However, my ex's lawyer is refusing to sign the independent legal representation form. They've reviewed it but in MY opinion ex's lawyer is pushing her to screw me over (some more lol) and is (in my opinion) disappointed he won't get a long running and expensive (for us) legal feud.
She's gone from being satisfied with the Sep Agmt draft when we reviewed it prior to lawyers to now feeling she's not getting what "she should get" (in opinion of her lawyer). I asked my lawyer for his "honest opinion" if he was my ex's lawyer and he feels that it's a fair deal.. He's not pushing me to go with less for ex and/or go to court.
I make decent money so let's just say that I suspect most of the support receipients on this forum would KILL to get the kind of deal I'm proposing. Ex will make more money from support than most people who work a decent full time job. My lawyer feels SS and CS are OK.
Ex's lawyer is saying words to the effect of "you don't need a lawyer to sign off on it; just the two of you sign and have signatures witnessed".
HOWEVER, MY understanding is that if the Independent Legal Advise isn't signed (which basically says lawyer has explained the Sep agmt, the client understands it, and other party isn't exerting undue influence) THEN later on it gives a big loophole to throw out the Sep Agmt. I don't want to sign something which is unenforcable but she IS willing to sign it.
By the way, the "undue influence" thing kills me. IN a divorce, BOTH parties are under extreme stress. Quite frankly I think I'm being forced to pay way too much but of course ex thinks she should get more. I'm sure everyone would love to fight in court IF it was "free" but of course it isn't. So, is "fear" of getting wiped out financially in court "undue influcence" and one party can argue later the deal shouldn't hold ?
Anyway, I would appreciate any comments on this. IF her lawyer refuses to sign the independent Legal advise/no undue influence ); even though the Sep Agmt itself requires my ex and I to confirm "no undue influence from anyone" what happens ?
Is the agreement useless (ie. easily overturned later without it ) ?
Is the agreement fine ?
To confirm it will hold up later if challenged, does she HAVE to get a lawyer to sign off ?
Any help would be appreciated.
We both have lawyers. However, my ex's lawyer is refusing to sign the independent legal representation form. They've reviewed it but in MY opinion ex's lawyer is pushing her to screw me over (some more lol) and is (in my opinion) disappointed he won't get a long running and expensive (for us) legal feud.
She's gone from being satisfied with the Sep Agmt draft when we reviewed it prior to lawyers to now feeling she's not getting what "she should get" (in opinion of her lawyer). I asked my lawyer for his "honest opinion" if he was my ex's lawyer and he feels that it's a fair deal.. He's not pushing me to go with less for ex and/or go to court.
I make decent money so let's just say that I suspect most of the support receipients on this forum would KILL to get the kind of deal I'm proposing. Ex will make more money from support than most people who work a decent full time job. My lawyer feels SS and CS are OK.
Ex's lawyer is saying words to the effect of "you don't need a lawyer to sign off on it; just the two of you sign and have signatures witnessed".
HOWEVER, MY understanding is that if the Independent Legal Advise isn't signed (which basically says lawyer has explained the Sep agmt, the client understands it, and other party isn't exerting undue influence) THEN later on it gives a big loophole to throw out the Sep Agmt. I don't want to sign something which is unenforcable but she IS willing to sign it.
By the way, the "undue influence" thing kills me. IN a divorce, BOTH parties are under extreme stress. Quite frankly I think I'm being forced to pay way too much but of course ex thinks she should get more. I'm sure everyone would love to fight in court IF it was "free" but of course it isn't. So, is "fear" of getting wiped out financially in court "undue influcence" and one party can argue later the deal shouldn't hold ?
Anyway, I would appreciate any comments on this. IF her lawyer refuses to sign the independent Legal advise/no undue influence ); even though the Sep Agmt itself requires my ex and I to confirm "no undue influence from anyone" what happens ?
Is the agreement useless (ie. easily overturned later without it ) ?
Is the agreement fine ?
To confirm it will hold up later if challenged, does she HAVE to get a lawyer to sign off ?
Any help would be appreciated.
Comment